Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,037

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pneumocystis Pneumonia

Thomas, Charles F., Limper, Andrew H.·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Pneumocystis pneumonia remains the most prevalent opportunistic infection in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Molecular techniques have provided new insights into the complex cell biology of this fungus. The authors summarize advances that have resulted from studies of the cell biology, biochemistry, and genetics of pneumocystis in the past several years and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia and for prophylaxis and treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra032588

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,037

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, C. F., & Limper, A. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-06-10
Volume
350
Issue
24
Pages
2487-2498
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2607650379
Cited by
1,037
References
3
FWCI
25.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pneumocystis Pneumonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra032588
The paper
Thomas, C. F., & Limper, A. H. (2004). Pneumocystis Pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra032588

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.