Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clostridium difficile— More Difficult Than Ever

Kelly, Ciarán P., LaMont, J. Thomas·2008·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Because of mutations in this opportunistic pathogen, infections with C. difficile have become both more prevalent and more virulent. This article summarizes recent changes in the epidemiology of this infection and explains what is known about the changes in disease severity and the response to therapy. The authors discuss the use of new antibiotics, probiotics, immunotherapy, and even bacteriotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra0707500

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 1,313

Metadata

Authors
Kelly, C. P., & LaMont, J. T.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2008-10-30
Volume
359
Issue
18
Pages
1932-1940
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2065777365
Cited by
1,313
References
47
FWCI
44.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clostridium difficile— More Difficult Than Ever. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra0707500
The paper
Kelly, C. P., & LaMont, J. T. (2008). Clostridium difficile— More Difficult Than Ever. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra0707500

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.