Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,065

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiac Plasticity

Hill, Joseph A., Olson, Eric N.·2008·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

This review explains how the heart responds to physiologic or pathologic conditions. Exercise, pregnancy, and postnatal growth cause physiologic growth; neurohumoral activation, hypertension, and myocardial injury cause hypertrophic growth, which increases the risk of heart failure and malignant arrhythmia. Atrophy of the heart can arise from protracted bed rest, prolonged weightlessness, or mechanical unloading with a ventricular assist device.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra072139

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 1,065

Metadata

Authors
Hill, J. A., & Olson, E. N.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2008-03-27
Volume
358
Issue
13
Pages
1370-1380
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4232767515
Cited by
1,065
References
13
FWCI
38.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac Plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra072139
The paper
Hill, J. A., & Olson, E. N. (2008). Cardiac Plasticity. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra072139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.