The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Open accessAbstract
epsis is one of the oldest and most elusive syndromes in medicine.Hippocrates claimed that sepsis (σ ήψις) was the process by which flesh rots, swamps generate foul airs, and wounds fester. 1 Galen later considered sepsis a laudable event, necessary for wound healing. 2 With the confirmation of germ theory by Semmelweis, Pasteur, and others, sepsis was recast as a systemic infection, often described as "blood poisoning," and assumed to be the result of the host's invasion by pathogenic organisms that then spread in the bloodstream.However, with the advent of modern antibiotics, germ theory did not fully explain the pathogenesis of sepsis: many patients with sepsis died despite successful eradication of the inciting pathogen.Thus, researchers suggested that it was the host, not the germ, that drove the pathogenesis of sepsis.3 In 1992, an international consensus panel defined sepsis as a systemic inflammatory response to infection, noting that sepsis could arise in response to multiple infectious causes and that septicemia was neither a necessary condition nor a helpful term.4 Instead, the panel proposed the term "severe sepsis" to describe instances in which sepsis is complicated by acute organ dysfunction, and they codified "septic shock" as sepsis complicated by either hypotension that is refractory to fluid resuscitation or by hyperlactatemia.In 2003, a second consensus panel endorsed most of these concepts, with the caveat that signs of a systemic inflammatory response, such as tachycardia or an elevated white-cell count, occur in many infectious and noninfectious conditions and therefore are not helpful in distinguishing sepsis from other conditions.5 Thus, "severe sepsis" and "sepsis" are sometimes used interchangeably to describe the syndrome of infection complicated by acute organ dysfunction. Incidence a nd C ause sThe incidence of severe sepsis depends on how acute organ dysfunction is defined and on whether that dysfunction is attributed to an underlying infection.Organ dysfunction is often defined by the provision of supportive therapy (e.g., mechanical ventilation), and epidemiologic studies thus count the "treated incidence" rather than the actual incidence.In the United States, severe sepsis is recorded in 2% of patients admitted to the hospital.Of these patients, half are treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), representing 10% of all ICU admissions.6,7 The number of cases in the United States exceeds 750,000 per year 7 and was recently reported to be rising.8 However, several factors -new International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding rules, confusion over the distinction between septicemia and severe sepsis, the increasing capacity to provide intensive care, and increased awareness and surveillance -confound the interpretation of temporal trends.Studies from other high-income countries show similar rates of sepsis in the ICU. 9 The incidence of severe sepsis outside modern ICUs, especially in parts ofThe New England
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock
Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., & Tomlanovich, M. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010307 · Cited by 10,743
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
Self-citationKumar, A., Roberts, D., Wood, K. E., Light, B., Parrillo, J. E., Sharma, S., Suppes, R., Feinstein, D., Zanotti, S., Taiberg, L., et al. (2006) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000217961.75225.e9 · Cited by 6,109
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Martin, G. S., Mannino, D. M., Eaton, S., & Moss, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022139 · Cited by 5,841
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
Hébert, P. C., Wells, G., Blajchman, M. A., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Pagliarello, G., Tweeddale, M., Schweitzer, I., & Yetisir, E. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902113400601 · Cited by 5,187
Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury
Zhang, Q., Raoof, M., Chen, Y., Sumi, Y., Sursal, T., Junger, W., Brohi, K., Itagaki, K., & Hauser, C. J. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08780 · Cited by 3,812
Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato, M. B. P., Barbas, C. S. V., Medeiros, D. M., Magaldi, R. B., Schettino, G. P., Lorenzi-Filho, G., Kairalla, R. A., Deheinzelin, D., Munoz, C., Oliveira, R., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802053380602 · Cited by 3,654
Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury
(2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062200 · Cited by 3,538
Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.
Iwashyna, T. J., Ely, E. W., Smith, D. M., & Langa, K. M. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1553 · Cited by 2,582
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1093/infdis/163.5.937 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccc.2008.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Cerra FB, 1985, Crit Care Clin, 1, 591, 10.1016/S0749-0704(18)30646-8 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.101.6.1481 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.273.2.117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/cc2917 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1202290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2009.1754 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.290.2.238 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/375593 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003246-200107001-00035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2010.851 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM198803243181202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/10408363.2011.641517 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccell.2010.12.011 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2012.5669 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1378/chest.11-0352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00134-002-1624-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1378/chest.112.1.235 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70265-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1172/JCI62423 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c98d21 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1172/JCI44266 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2011.1829 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2008.697 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1213/ane.0b013e318195e11d · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.168.5.2493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6952 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/epi.6.3.14017 · DOI
- 10.1093/bja/aer093 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/AAC.00627-10 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000143118.41100.14 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01108-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2012.5833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.38028.520995.63 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182416ecf · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2009.815 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.288.7.862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa071366 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2011.1853 · DOI
- 10.1093/bja/aep128 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295312.13466.1C · DOI
- 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821b8290 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1222878110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1084/jem.20070404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/cc10537 · DOI
- 10.1164/rccm.200903-0363OC · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3).
Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., Bellomo, R., Bernard, G. R., Chiche, J.-D., Coopersmith, C. M., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287 · Cited by 28,250
Self-citationFleischmann, C., Scherag, A., Adhikari, N. K. J., Hartog, C. S., Tsaganos, T., Schlattmann, P., Angus, D. C., & Reinhart, K. (2016) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201504-0781oc · Cited by 3,548
Self-citationA randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock.
The ProCESS Investigators (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1401602 · Cited by 2,414
Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis
Seymour, C. W., Kennedy, J. N., Wang, S., Chang, C.-C. H., Elliott, C. F., Xu, Z., Berry, S., Clermont, G., Cooper, G., Gomez, H., et al. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5791 · Cited by 1,567
Self-citationEnhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review
Prescott, H. C., & Angus, D. C. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17687 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Angus, D. C., & van der Poll, T.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2013-08-29
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 840-851
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2164990391
- Cited by
- 3,961
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 209.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra1208623
- The paper
- Angus, D. C., & van der Poll, T. (2013). Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1208623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.