Cited by 741Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Improvement in Process of Care and Outcome After a Multicenter Severe Sepsis Educational Program in Spain

Ferrer, Ricard·2008·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Concern exists that current guidelines for care of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock are followed variably, possibly due to a lack of adequate education. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a national educational program based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines affected processes of care and hospital mortality for severe sepsis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Before and after design in 59 medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) located throughout Spain. All ICU patients were screened daily and enrolled if they fulfilled severe sepsis or septic shock criteria. A total of 854 patients were enrolled in the preintervention period (November-December 2005), 1465 patients during the postintervention period (March-June 2006), and 247 patients during the long-term follow-up period 1 year later (November-December 2006) in a subset of 23 ICUs. INTERVENTION: The educational program consisted of training physicians and nursing staff from the emergency department, wards, and ICU in the definition, recognition, and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock as outlined in the guidelines. Treatment was organized in 2 bundles: a resuscitation bundle (6 tasks to begin immediately and be accomplished within 6 hours) and a management bundle (4 tasks to be completed within 24 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital mortality, differences in adherence to the bundles' process-of-care variables, ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementing standardized bundles can help ensure timely and proper sepsis care and has been associated with reductions in mortality.

    “Implementing standardized bundles can help ensure timely and proper sepsis care and has been associated with reductions in mortality [11-13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrer, R.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Ferrer, Ricard
Venue
JAMA
Published
2008-05-21
Volume
299
Issue
19
Pages
2294
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2103053257
Cited by
741
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 77
FWCI
46.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Keywords
severe sepsis, septic shock, Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, clinical practice guideline adherence, educational intervention, process of care, in-hospital mortality, ICU mortality, intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, broad-spectrum antibiotics, mechanical ventilation, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Inservice Training, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Shock, Septic, Spain, Hospital Mortality, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Sepsis, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review