The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Physicians
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The recent public reporting of payments made to physicians by manufacturers of orthopedic devices provides an opportunity to assess the accuracy of physicians' conflict-of-interest disclosures. METHODS: We analyzed the reports of payments made to physicians by five manufacturers of total hip and knee prostheses in 2007. For each payment recipient who was an author of a presentation or served as a committee member or board member at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the disclosure statement was reviewed to determine whether the payment had been disclosed. To ascertain the reasons for nondisclosure, a survey was administered to physicians who had received payments that were not disclosed. RESULTS: The overall rate of disclosure was 71.2% (245 of 344 payments). For payments that were directly related to the topic of the presentation at the meeting, the rate was 79.3% (165 of 208); for payments that were indirectly related, the rate was 50.0% (16 of 32); and for payments that were unrelated, the rate was 49.2% (29 of 59) (P=0.008). In the multivariate analysis, payments were also more likely to have been disclosed if they exceeded $10,000 (P<0.001), were directed toward an individual physician rather than a company or organization (P=0.04), or included an in-kind component (P=0.002). Among the 36 physicians who responded to the survey regarding reasons for nondisclosure (response rate, 39.6%), the reasons most commonly given for nondisclosure were that the payment was unrelated to the topic of presentation at the annual meeting (38.9% of respondents) and that the physician had misunderstood the disclosure requirements (13.9%); 11.1% reported that the payment had been disclosed but was mistakenly omitted from the program. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of self-reported conflict-of-interest disclosure by physicians at a large annual meeting, the rate of disclosure was 79.3% for directly related payments and 50.0% for indirectly related payments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167 · Cited by 2,147
Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review
Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.454 · Cited by 1,816
Als-Nielsen, B., Chen, W., Gluud, C., & Kjaergard, L. L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.7.921 · Cited by 746
Perlis, R. H., Perlis, C. S., Wu, Y., Hwang, C., Joseph, M., & Nierenberg, A. A. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1957 · Cited by 318
Bero, L., Oostvogel, F., Bacchetti, P., & Lee, K. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040184 · Cited by 249
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine
Shah, R. V., Albert, T. J., Bruegel-Sanchez, V., Vaccaro, A. R., Hilibrand, A. S., & Grauer, J. N. (2005) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000161004.15308.b4 · Cited by 155
Cited by
Human Gut Microbiota: Repertoire and Variations
Lagier, J.-C., Million, M., Hugon, P., Armougom, F., & Raoult, D. (2012) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00136 · Cited by 329
Bottema‐Beutel, K., Crowley, S., Sandbank, M., & Woynaroski, T. G. (2021) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13249 · Cited by 137
Forsyth, S. R., Odierna, D. H., Krauth, D., & Bero, L. A. (2014) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-122 · Cited by 50
Conflicts of interest disclosure forms and management in critical care clinical practice guidelines
Alhazzani, W., Lewis, K., Jaeschke, R., Rochwerg, B., Møller, M. H., Evans, L., Wilson, K. C., Patel, S., Coopersmith, C. M., Cecconi, M., et al. (2018) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5367-6 · Cited by 42
Baethge, C. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.128 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Wei, E. X., Mehlman, C. T., & Bhandari, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2009-10-08
- Volume
- 361
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1466-1474
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2128399763
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Physicians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa0807160
- The paper
- Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Wei, E. X., Mehlman, C. T., & Bhandari, M. (2009). Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Physicians. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0807160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.