Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 964

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Derivation of Embryonic Stem-Cell Lines from Human Blastocysts

Open access
Cowan, Chad A., Klimanskaya, Irina, McMahon, Jill, Atienza, Jocelyn, Witmyer, Jeannine, Zucker, Jacob P., Wang, Shunping, Morton, Cynthia C., McMahon, Andrew P., Powers, Doug, Melton, Douglas A.·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells have the unique ability to form all adult cell types.Harnessing this potential may provide a source of cells to replace those that are lost or impaired as a result of disease.Moreover, the derivation of human embryonic stem cells opens a unique window into the study of early human development.At present, approximately 15 human embryonic stem-cell lines are publicly available, and they vary considerably in their usefulness for research and the extent of their characterization (see http://stemcells.nih.gov/registry/index.asp).To promote further research with human embryonic stem cells, we sought to derive and characterize more fully cell lines that meet strict criteria for ease of manipulation, including enzymatic passage with trypsin, streamlined freezing and thawing procedures, well-defined culture mediums, and straightforward methods for in vitro differentiation.We report the derivation and characterization of 17 additional human embryonic stem cell lines.We obtained frozen cleavage-and blastocyststage human embryos, produced by in vitro fertilization for clinical purposes, after obtaining written informed consent and approval by a Harvard institutional review board.A total of 286 frozen and thawed cleaved embryos (6 to 12 cells each) were cultured to the blastocyst stage, and 58 frozen and thawed blastocysts were allowed to re-expand in culture, whereupon they were treated with Tyrode's solution to remove the zona pellucida, followed by immunosurgery to isolate inner cell masses. 1 Many of these embryos were of such poor quality that they did not develop or divide after thawing.Nevertheless, 97 inner cell masses were isolated, and 17 individual human embryonic stem-cell lines (HUES1 through HUES17) were derived according to published protocols that we modified in terms of medium composition, enzymatic dissociation, and pro-The New England

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsr040330

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 964

Metadata

Authors
Cowan, C. A., Klimanskaya, I., McMahon, J., Atienza, J., Witmyer, J., Zucker, J. P., Wang, S., Morton, C. C., McMahon, A. P., Powers, D., & Melton, D. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-03-25
Volume
350
Issue
13
Pages
1353-1356
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1988865085
Cited by
964
References
19
FWCI
30.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation of Embryonic Stem-Cell Lines from Human Blastocysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsr040330
The paper
Cowan, C. A., Klimanskaya, I., McMahon, J., Atienza, J., Witmyer, J., Zucker, J. P., Wang, S., Morton, C. C., McMahon, A. P., Powers, D., & Melton, D. A. (2004). Derivation of Embryonic Stem-Cell Lines from Human Blastocysts. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr040330

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.