Cited by 616Air Quality and Health ImpactsClimate Change and Health ImpactsFire effects on ecosystems

Wildfires, global climate change, and human health

Open access
Xu, Rongbin, Yu, Pei, Abramson, Michael J., Johnston, Fay H., Samet, Jonathan M., Bell, Michelle L., Haines, Andy, Ebi, Kristie L. +2 more·2020·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Wildfires, Global Climate Change, and Human Health Wildfires are increasingly common and projected to worsen with climate change. Health consequences include burns and mental health effects, as wel...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsr2028985

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wildfires have been increasing in intensity and frequency because of longer warm seasons, increasing periods of droughts, and drier soil and vegetation.

    “Wildfires have been increasing in intensity and frequency because of longer warm seasons, increasing periods of droughts, and drier soil and vegetation.5,18,53”

    From Effects of Extreme Weather on Health in Underserved Communities (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The “Climate Change and Wildfires” section says drought, moisture loss from soil, and a longer wildfire season can increase wildfire risk. It describes increases in forest-fire risk and severity chiefly as future expectations, however, rather than establishing that wildfires have already increased in both frequency and intensity. It also reports a decline in the overall global area burned since 1930; the copy provides no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Wildfire smoke exposure during childhood is associated with increased likelihood of mental illness in adulthood, a decrease in academic performance, and exacerbation of asthma, pneumonia, and bronchitis.

    “Wildfire smoke exposure during childhood is associated with increased likelihood of mental illness in adulthood, a decrease in academic performance, and exacerbation of asthma, pneumonia, and bronchitis.2,5”

    From Effects of Extreme Weather on Health in Underserved Communities (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Direct Health Risks from Wildfire Events section reports that childhood exposure to wildfires was associated with adult mental illness and that wildfire events were associated with lower academic performance in children. The Short-Term Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke section links smoke to asthma-related events and respiratory infections. It does not attribute the mental-health or academic findings specifically to smoke, or identify pneumonia and bronchitis specifically; the respiratory findings are not limited to childhood exposure. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Wildfire smoke exposure in pregnant women is linked to adverse birth effects such as preterm birth and lower birth weight.

    “Pregnant women are also at risk to the effects of wildfire smoke as exposure has been linked to adverse birth effects such as preterm birth and lower birth weight.5”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. Finlay SE, Moffat A, Gazzard R, Baker D, Murray V. Health impacts of wildfires. PLoS Curr 2012; 4: e4f959951cce2c.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, R., Yu, P., Abramson, M. J., Johnston, F. H., Samet, J. M., Bell, M. L., Haines, A., Ebi, K. L., Li, S., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-11-26
Volume
383
Issue
22
Pages
2173-2181
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3092358196
Cited by
616
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 1
FWCI
28.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • University of Washington
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • University of Tasmania
  • Monash University (VIC 3004)
  • China Scholarship Council (201906210065, APP1107107, 201806010405, APP1109193)
  • Menzies Institute for Medical Research
  • Medical Research Council (APP1107107)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (201806010405, 1107107, 201906210065, 1109193)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
forest fires, climate change, human health, burns, mental health, air pollution
MeSH terms
Wildfires, Health Status, Humans, Smoke, Global Health, Particulate Matter, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review