Cited by 68Education Discipline and InequalityBehavioral and Psychological StudiesLegal Issues in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

School-wide Positive and Restorative Discipline (SWPRD): Integrating School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports and Restorative Discipline

Abstract

Vincent et al. introduce School-wide Positive and Restorative Discipline (SWPRD), an intervention system blending school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports with restorative practices to promote positive classroom relationships. They hypothesize that positive classroom relationships function as a conduit for greater disciplinary equity for students from vulnerable groups defined by race/ethnicity and sexual orientation. Results from a pilot test in one high school show that after the introduction of SWPRD, teachers reported greater use of restorative practices in their classrooms, there was a reduction of the impact of race/ethnicity and sexual orientation on student perceptions of fairness and bullying and harassment, and there was a reduction in both numbers of office discipline referrals and racial disparities. The authors conclude by highlighting the importance of creating positive classroom environments to reduce disciplinary disparities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/978-1-137-51257-4_7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vincent et al.'s (2016) non-experimental study of one high school adopting the integrated approach found substantial reductions in office disciplinary referrals and racial disparities; however, student perceptions of disciplinary fairness dropped.

    “Vincent et al.'s (2016) non-experimental study of one high school adopting the integrated approach found substantial reductions in office disciplinary referrals and racial disparities; however, student perceptions of disciplinary fairness dropped.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Amstutz, L. S., & Mullet, J. H. (2005). The little book of restorative discipline for schools: Teaching responsibility: Creating caring climates. Intercourse, PA: GoodBooks.
  2. Cohen, R., Kincaid, D., & Childs, K. E. (2007). Measuring school-wide positive behavior support implementation development and validation of the benchmarks of quality. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 203–213. · DOI
  3. Costello, B., Wachtel, J., & Wachtel, T. (2009). The restorative practices handbook for teachers, disciplinarians, and administrators. Bethlehem, PA: International Institute for Restorative Practices.
  4. Costello, B., Wachtel, J., & Wachtel, T. (2010). Restorative circles in schools: Building community and enhancing learning. Bethlehem, PA: International Institute for Restorative Practices.
  5. DeWitt, D. M., & DeWitt, L. J. (2012). A case of high school hazing: Applying restorative justice to promote organizational learning. NASSP Bulletin, 96(3), 228–242. doi: 10.1177/0192636512452338 . · DOI
  6. Gouveia-Pereira, M., Vala, J., Palmonari, A., & Rubini, M. (2003). School experience, relational justice and legitimation of institutional. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 309–325. · DOI
  7. Gregory A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2014). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher–student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. For a special issue on restorative justice in the Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. doi:10.1080/10474412.2014.929950 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gregory, A., & Ripsky, M. B. (2008). Adolescent trust in teachers: Implication for behavior in the high school classroom. School Psychology Review, 37, 337–353. · DOI
  9. Himmelstein, K. E., & Brückner, H. (2011). Criminal-justice and school sanctions against nonheterosexual youth: A national longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127(1), 49–57. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2306 . · DOI
  10. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8), 1–14. · DOI
  11. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., et al. (2009). A randomized, waitlist-controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144. doi: 10.1177/1098300709332067 . · DOI
  12. Kaufman, J. S., Jaser, S. S., Vaughan, E. L., Reynolds, J. S., Di Donato, J., Bernard, S. N., & Hernandez-Brereton, M. (2010). Patterns in office discipline referral data by grade, race/ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 44–54. · DOI
  13. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 899–916. · DOI
  14. Losen, D. J. (2014). Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion. New York: Teachers College Press.
  15. May, S., Ard III, W., Todd, A. W., Horner, R. H., Glasgow, A., Sugai, G., et al. (2003). School-wide Information System. Eugene, OR: Oregon Educational and Community Supports University.
  16. Morrison, B. E., & Martinez, M. (2001). Restorative justice through social and emotional skills training: An evaluation of primary school students. Unpublished honours thesis. Australian National University, Canberra.
  17. Muscott, H., Mann, E., & LeBrun, M. (2008). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in New Hampshire: Effects of large-scale implementation of schoolwide positive behavior support on student discipline and academic achievement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 190–205. · DOI
  18. Noguera, P., & Wing, J. Y. (2006). Unfinished business: Closing the racial achievement gap in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83–115. · DOI
  20. Sanches, C., Gouveia-Pereira, M., & Carugati, F. (2011). Justice judgements, school failure, and adolescent deviant behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 606–621. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02048.x . · DOI
  21. Simson, D. (2012, May). Restorative justice and its effects on (racially disparate) punitive school discipline. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper, Stanford, CA: Stanford University. · DOI
  22. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Algozzine, R., Barrett, S., Lewis, T., Anderson, C., et al. (2010). School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Implementers’ blueprint and self-assessment. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
  23. Sugai, G., Sprague, J. R., Horner, R. H., & Walker, H. M. (2000). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94–101. · DOI
  24. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  25. Taylor-Greene, S., Brown, D., Nelson, L., Longton, J., Gassman, T., Cohen, J., Hall, S. (1997). School-wide behavioral support: Starting the year off right. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 99–112. · DOI
  26. Vincent, C. G., Sprague, J. R., CHiXapkaid, Tobin, T., & Gau, J. (2015). Effectiveness of School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports in reducing racially inequitable disciplinary exclusions. In D. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 207–221). New York: Teachers College Press.
  27. Vincent, C. G., & Tobin, T. J. (2011). An examination of the relationship between implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) and exclusion of students from various ethnic backgrounds with and without disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 217–232. · DOI
  28. Vincent, C. G., Tobin, T. J., Hawken, L., & Frank, J. (2012). Disciplinary referrals and access to secondary interventions: Patterns across students across African-American, Hispanic-American, and White backgrounds. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 431–445. · DOI
  29. Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vincent, C. G., Inglish, J., Girvan, E. J., Sprague, J. R., & McCabe, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Inequality in School Discipline
Published
2016
Pages
115-134
OpenAlex
W2512877089
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.16
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports, restorative practices, restorative discipline, racial disparities, sexual orientation, bullying and harassment, office discipline referrals, high school students, intervention integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review