The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The “Newer Ideals” of Jane Addams’s Progressivism: A Realistic Utopia of Cosmopolitan Justice
Abstract
Jane Addams, in both her thought and activism during the Progressive era, was focused on human problems at both local and global levels and asked of each level what a democratic attitude of radical social justice could bring to felt indeterminacies. She employed a philosophical method associated with American pragmatism, made her own as a relational and feminist approach—inseparable from her lived experience as a woman and advocate of social reform domestically and internationally. The historical context of the Progressive era and Addams’s experience of it, her part in the American Settlement movement and her leadership of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom are discussed to illuminate her human-centered, democratic social approach to international relations. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jane Addams maintained a pacifist stance; democracy as a way of life could not be realized through such means.
“Jane Addams, in the face of harsh public criticism … maintained a pacifist stance; democracy as a way of life could not be realized through such means.”
From Jane Addams and John Dewey (2022) · cites this paper as Cochran, 2017
For Dewey, US participation in World War I was needed to defeat Germany and move to public control of transnational interests and world organization; war was a necessary means to international democratic ends.
“For Dewey, US participation was needed to defeat Germany and move to the impor tant business of public control of transnational interests and world organization; war was a necessary means to international democratic ends.”
From Jane Addams and John Dewey (2022) · cites this paper as Cochran, 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- ———. 1898. The College Woman and the Family Claim. In The Major Works of Jane Addams, Electronic ed., 1–7. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation, 2002.
- ———. 1916. The Long Road of Woman’s Memory. In The Major Works of Jane Addams, Electronic ed. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation, 2002.
- Addams, Jane, Emily Balch, and Alice Hamilton. 2003 (1915). Women at the Hague: The International Congress of Women and Its Results. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Balch, Emily. 1938. Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, 1915–1938: A Venture in Internationalism. Geneva: Maison Internationale.
- Davis, Allen F. 1973. American Heroine: The Life and Legend of Jane Addams. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Deegan, M.J. 1988. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
- Dewey, John. 1908. What Pragmatism Means by Practical. In The Collected Works of John Dewey, 1882–1953. In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1907–1909, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 4, Electronic ed., 98–115. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation, 2003.
- ———. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. In The Collected Works of John Dewey, 1882–1953. In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 11, Electronic ed. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation, 2003.
- ———. 1937. Democracy and Educational Administration. In The Collected Works of John Dewey, 1882–1953. In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 2, Electronic ed., 217–25. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation, 2003.
- ———. 2010. Dewey: Lectures. Electronic ed. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation.
- Dieleman, Susan, David Rondel, and Christopher Voparil. 2017. Pragmatism and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Feuer, Lewis. 1959. John Dewey and the Back to the People Movement in American Thought. Journal of the History of Ideas 20: 545–568. · DOI
- Fischer, Marilyn. 2004. Democracy and Social Ethics and the Long Road of Woman’s Memory Book Review. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18: 85–88. · DOI
- Green, Judith. 2010. Social Democracy, Cosmopolitan Hospitality, and Intercivilizational Peace: Lessons from Jane Addams. In Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. Maurice Hamington, 223–254. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
- Hamington, Maurice. 2004. Addams’s Radical Democracy: Moving Beyond Rights. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18: 216–223. · DOI
- ———. 2007. Two Leaders, Two Utopias: Jane Addams and Dorothy Day. NWSA Journal 19: 159–186. · DOI
- Knight, Louise W. 2005. Citizen: Jane Addams and the Struggle for Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
- Levine, Daniel. 1964. Varieties of Reform Thought. Madison, WI: The State Historical Society of Wisconsin.
- Lynd, Staughton. 1961. Jane Addams and the Radical Impulse. Commentary 32: 54–59.
- MacMullan, Terrance. 2001. On War as Waste: Jane Addams’s Pragmatic Pacifism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 15: 86–104. · DOI
- Mahowald, Mary. 1997. What Classical American Philosophers Missed: Jane Addams, Critical Pragmatism, and Cultural Feminism. The Journal of Value Inquiry 31: 39–54. · DOI
- McKenna, Erin. 2001. The Task of Utopia: A Pragmatist and Feminist Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
- Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- ———. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Rorty, Richard. 1993. Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality. In On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, ed. Stephen Shute and Susan Hurley, 111–134. New York: Basic Books.
- ———. 2005. Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Rupp, Leila J. 1997. Worlds of Women: The Making of an International Women’s Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Sarvasy, Wendy. 2010. Engendering Democracy by Socializing It: Jane Addams’s Contribution to Feminist Political Theorizing. In Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. Maurice Hamington, 293–310. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.
- Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1991. The Missing Perspective: Feminist Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 27: 405–416.
- ———. 1996. Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- ———. 1999. Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29: 207–230. · DOI
- Voparil, Christopher. 2017. Pragmatism’s Contribution to Nonideal Theorizing: Fraser, Addams, and Rorty. In Pragmatism and Justice, ed. Susan Dieleman, David Rondel, and Christopher Voparil, 65–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ralston, S. J. (2022) · The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.34 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochran, M.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cochran, Molly
- ORCID
- Cochran, Molly
- Venue
- Progressivism and US Foreign Policy between the World Wars
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan US
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 143-165
- OpenAlex
- W2764171555
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Radar (Oxford Brookes University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Keywords
- Jane Addams, progressive politics, Progressive Era, social justice, cosmopolitan justice, American pragmatism, feminist philosophy, settlement movement, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, international relations, democracy, utopia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review