CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Afro-Latin American StudiesSocial and Economic SolidarityHistory and Politics in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Everyday Social Economy of Afro-Descendants in the Chocó, Colombia

Tubb, Daniel G. L.·2018·Perspectives from Social Economics
DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-60047-9_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Black communities which formed in the Colombian Pacific in the 1980s and 1990s claimed collective territorial rights to hundreds of thousands of hectares of forest. Rural Black activists—in some areas connected with the Catholic Church or with regional non-governmental organizations—mobilized, and over time won, legal titles to the territories where rural Black people had long combined subsistence production, artisanal gold mining, and itinerant labor. This chapter traces a Black social economy that can be found outside of these more formal political processes, through forms of production, savings, labor, exchange, and self-help unmediated by community politics or by household economies. The chapter shows how an everyday Black social economy exists at the margins of social movement politics and the household economy and is pre-discursive and not encompassed by the language of collective territories, collective titles, or community councils.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/978-1-137-60047-9_6

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. CODHES. 2013. La Crisis Humanitaria en Colombia Persiste. El Pacífico en Disputa: Informe de Desplazamiento Forzado en 2012. Bogotá: Consultoría para los Derechos Humanos y el Desplazamiento (CODHES).
  2. Díaz-Geada, Alba. 2013. Mudar en Común. Cambios económicos, sociais e culturais no rural galego do franquismo e da transición (1959–1982). Dissertation, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
  3. ———. 1907. Economic Co-operation Among Negro Americans. Atlanta: The Atlanta University Press.
  4. Howald, Claudia. 2016. Paysans, afrocolombiens, déplacés: Leaders entre communautés rurales et urbaines au Chocó, Colombie. Nokoko 5: 135–170.
  5. Oslender, Ulrich, Juana Camacho, and Eduardo Restrepo. 1999. De Montes, Ríos y Ciudades. Territorios e identidades de la gente negra en Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología.
  6. ———. 2011. Representaciones y prácticas asociadas a la muerte en los Ríos Satinga y Sanquianga, Pacífico Sur Colombiano. Piedra de Panduro 8: 78–102.
  7. ———. 2013. Etnización de la Negridad: La invención de las ‘comunidades Negras’ como grupo étnico en Colombia. Cali: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Tubb, D. G. L.
Venue
Perspectives from Social Economics
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Published
2017-09-13
Pages
97-117
ISSN
  • 2662-396X (ISSN-L)
  • 2662-3978
DOI
10.1057/978-1-137-60047-9_6
OpenAlex
W2756173256
Cited by
2
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Perspectives from social economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History and Politics in Latin America
Keywords
Afro-descendants, Black communities, social economy, everyday economy, Chocó, land title, artisanal gold mining, subsistence production, savings, self-help, informal economy, social movements, Catholic Church, non-governmental organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review