The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis
Abstract
The aim of this volume is to critically examine the foundation and basic elements of discourse-analytical research as it has been developing for roughly two decades. The focus is therefore on the elementary and paradigmatic. This is both an opportunity and a danger. There is the danger of virtually losing contact with the ground, that is, the concrete reality of research, in the Olympian spheres of the fundamental. At the same time this offers an opportunity to go beyond one’s own research practice, to reflect for a moment on the basis of this very research practice and, by doing so, ultimately reap a benefit for this practice. The range of contributions included in this volume and the quality of the authors will hopefully guarantee that the opportunity will prevail against the danger. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
Fairclough, N. L. (1989) · Cited by 6,650
Connerton, P. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628061 · Cited by 6,086
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis
van Dijk, T. A. (1993) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006 · Cited by 5,077
Cited by
Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests
Spaiser, V., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Russmann, F., & Helbing, D. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288 · Cited by 77
Lee, J.-A., & Kim, C.-J. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9659-6 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, G., & Wodak, R.
- Venue
- Critical Discourse Analysis
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 1-32
- OpenAlex
- W56876559
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 115.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230288423_1
- The paper
- Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288423_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.