Cited by 77Social Media and PoliticsSociopolitical Dynamics in RussiaMedia Influence and Politics

Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests

Open access
Spaiser, Viktoria, Chadefaux, Thomas, Donnay, Karsten, Russmann, Fabian, Helbing, Dirk·2017·Journal of Information Technology & Politics

Abstract

In 2011-2012 Russia experienced a wave of mass protests surrounding the Duma and presidential elections. The protests, however, faded shortly after the second election. We study the Russian political discourse on Twitter during this period and the main actors involved: the pro-government camp, the opposition and the general public. We analyse around 700.000 Russian Twitter messages and investigate the social networks of the most active Twitter users. Our analysis shows that pro-government users employed a variety of communication strategies to shift the political discourse and marginalise oppositional voices on Twitter. This demonstrates how authorities can disempower regime critics and successfully manipulate public opinion on social media casting doubt on the assertion that traditional powers are necessarily disadvantaged in an increasingly networked and digitalised society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authorities propagate a pro-government image and attempt to spread information about its strength and popularity.

    “Here, authorities propagate a pro-government image and attempt to spread information about its strength and popularity (Guriev & Treisman, 2019; MacKinnon, 2011; Spaiser etal., 2017).”

    From How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay (2020) · cites this paper as Spaiser et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gaffney, D. (2010). #iranElection: Quantifying online acti- vism. Retrieved from http://journal.webscience.org/295/2/ websci10_submission_6.pdf
  2. Laclau, E. (1993). Discourse. In R. E. Goodin, & P. Pettit (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to contemporary political philosophy. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spaiser, V., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Russmann, F., & Helbing, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Spaiser, Viktoria
Venue
Journal of Information Technology & Politics
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
132-153
ISSN
  • 1933-1681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-169X
OpenAlex
W3123669443
Cited by
77
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
24.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Information Technology & Politics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • ERC Advanced Investigator Grant “Momentum” (324247)
  • CHIRP II project ETH “Systemic Risks, Systemic Solutions” (CHIRP II project ETH 48 12-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
Twitter, political discourse, social media manipulation, communication strategies, oppositional discourse, public opinion, social networks, Russian State Duma, Russian presidential election

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review