Cited by 1Religion, Society, and DevelopmentIndian and Buddhist StudiesDiaspora, migration, transnational identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intersecting Diasporas: Sri Lankan Buddhist Temples in Malaysia and Development across the Indian Ocean

Samuels, Jeffrey·2013·Diaspora Engagement and Development in South Asia

Abstract

When I first began researching Buddhism in Malaysia in 2009, I remember feeling astonished at the range of social welfare projects being carried out at the Sri Lankan Buddhist temples there. Although I encountered a number of monks in Sri Lanka engaged in social work during my ten years of research on the island (see, for instance, Samuels, 2003), the range of activities in Malaysia far surpassed anything I had witnessed in Sri Lanka. Moreover, while the projects in Sri Lanka were mostly targeted to specific communities and villages there, the geographical reach of the projects in Malaysia as well as the social networks that gave rise to that reach were far more expansive. What roles are the temples in Malaysia playing in the development of Sri Lanka? What accounted for the differences regarding social welfare work between the temples in Malaysia and those in Sri Lanka? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781137334459_11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sri Lankan Buddhist temples in Malaysia are important diasporic institutions for the celebration of calendrical rites, rituals, and festivals, as well as the operation of religious and language schools.

    “Jeffrey Samuels illustrates that Sri Lankan Buddhist temples are important diasporic institutions for the celebration of calendrical rites, rituals, and festivals, as well as the operation of religious and language schools.”
  • Some Sinhalese Buddhists lament that their Theravāda temples became exposed to Chinese Buddhist iconography, new rituals, and new festive celebrations.

    “Some Sinhalese Buddhists lament that their Theravāda temples subsequently became exposed to Chinese Buddhist iconography, new rituals, and new festive celebrations (2013: 124 -125).”
  • Interactions between Sri Lankan Theravāda and Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhists have contributed to the production of new local practices in Malaysia.

    “In addition, interactions between Sri Lankan Theravāda and Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhists have contributed to the production of new local practices in Malaysia.”
  • Growing interest in Theravāda Buddhism among Chinese Malaysian Buddhists has altered Sri Lankan monastic culture in Malaysia.

    “Moreover, Samuels notices that growing interest in Theravāda Buddhism among Chinese Malaysian Buddhists has altered Sri Lankan monastic culture in Malaysia.”
  • Sri Lankan temples in Malaysia provide Sri Lankan Buddhists with the 'social context' and reproduce the devotees' 'social memory' of Sri Lanka, allowing the community to maintain their collective identity as Sri Lankans living in the diaspora.

    “He argues that Sri Lankan temples in Malaysia provide Sri Lankan Buddhists with the ' social context ' and reproduce the devotees ' ' social memory ' of Sri Lanka, allowing the community in Malaysia to maintain their own collective identity as Sri Lankans living in the diaspora.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Arseculeratne, S. N. (1991) Sinhalese Immigrants in Malaysia and Singapore 1860–1990: History through Recollection. Colombo: K. V. G. De Silva and Sons.
  2. De Silva, H. M. A. (1998) 100 Years of the Buddhist Maha Vihara (1895–1995). Kuala Lumpur: Sasana Abhiwurdhi Wardhana Society.
  3. DeBernardi, Jean (2004) Rites of Belonging: Memory, Modernity, and Identity in a Malaysian Chinese Community. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  4. DeBernardi, Jean. (1994) ‘Historical Allusion and the Defense of Identity: Malaysian Chinese Popular Religion.’ In Asian Visions of Authority, edited by Charles Keyes, Kendall Laurel and Hardacre Helen, 117–139. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. · DOI
  5. Huang, C. Julia (2008) Charisma and Compassion: Cheng Yen and the Buddhist Tu Chi Movement. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  6. Huang, C. Julia. (2005) ‘The Compassion Relief Diaspora.’ In Buddhist Missionaries in the Era of Globalization, edited by Learman Linda, 185–209. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  7. Indaratana, Ven, Elgiriye, C. Witanachchi, and Lilianne Lim (2004) Mahindarama Buddhist Temple: 85 Years of History (1918–2003). Penang: Mahindarama Dhamma Publications.
  8. Pittman, Don A. (2001) Toward a Modern Chinese Buddhism: Taixu’s Reforms. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Samarawickrama, Vijaya (2003) A Buddhist Reflects on Malaysian Buddhism.Kuala Lumpur: Sasana Abhiwurdhi Wardhana Society and Sri Jayanti Association.
  10. Samuels, Jeffrey (2011) ‘“Forget Not Your Old Country”: Absence, Identity, and Marginalization in the Practice and Development of Sri Lankan Buddhism in Malaysia.’ South Asian Diaspora 3(1): 117–132. · DOI
  11. Samuels, Jeffrey. (2003) ‘Establishing the Basis of the Sasana: Social Service and Ritual Performance in Contemporary Sri Lankan Monastic Training.’ In Approaching the Dhamma: Buddhist Texts and Practices in South and Southeast Asia,editedby Anne Blackburn and Samuels Jeffrey, 105–124. Seattle: BPS Pariyatti Editions.
  12. Sri Jayanti Association. (2000) The Sri Lanka Buddhist Temple: A Historical Overview 1900–2000. Kuala Lumpur: Siri Jayanti Association, Sri Lanka Buddhist Temple.
  13. Sri Jayanti Association. (2004) Venerable B. Saranankara Thero: 20 Years of Dhammaduta, 1984–2004. Kuala Lumpur: Siri Jayanti Association.
  14. Tan, Chee-Beng (2012) ‘Shantang: Charitable Temples in China, Singapore, and Malaysia.’ Asian Ethnology 71(1): 75–107.
  15. Topley, Marjorie (1961) ‘The Emergence and Social Function of Chinese Religious Associations in Singapore.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 3(3): 289–314. · DOI
  16. Wang, Tai Peng (1994) The Origins of Chinese Kongsi. Petaling Jaya (Malaysia): Pelanduk Publications.
  17. Yen, Ching-Hwang (2008) The Chinese In Southeast Asia And Beyond: Socioeconomic and Political Dimensions. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing Company. · DOI
  18. Yen, Ching-Hwang. (1981) ‘Early Chinese Clan Organizations in Singapore and Malaya, 1819–1911.’ Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 12(1): 62–92. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Samuels, J.
Corresponding author
Samuels, Jeffrey
Venue
Diaspora Engagement and Development in South Asia
Published
2013
Pages
194-211
OpenAlex
W2468923119
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
Keywords
Malaysian diaspora, Buddhist diaspora, social welfare, development, Indian Ocean, Buddhist monks, transnational religious networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review