Rethinking the Relationship Between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizations use impression management tactics, often routinized claims or strategic symbols, to promote positive audience perceptions.
“Organizations engage in various forms of impression management to promote positive audience perceptions.”
From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as King and Whetten, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 343
- Authors
- King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Brigham Young University (US)
- ORCID
- King, Brayden G
- Venue
- Corporate Reputation Review
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 192-207
- ISSN
- 1363-3589 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1889
- OpenAlex
- W2044449100
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 31.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Corporate Reputation Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Keywords
- organizational reputation, organizational legitimacy, social identity theory, reference groups, stakeholder perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
