Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are We Making a Better World with Icts? Reflections on a Future Agenda for the IS Field

Walsham, Geoff·2012·Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Dramatic changes in context have occurred over the last 25 years for those of us working in the information systems (IS) field, with ICTs becoming pervasive in many areas of human activity and in all countries of the world. It is ironic that the success of ICTs has led to concerns that the distinct research contribution of the IS field could become lost and that the field itself may decline. The literature over the last decade or so has offered different and sometimes opposing suggestions as to how the field should respond to these concerns. In this paper, I discuss these debates and I use the discussion as a basis for putting forward a skeleton future agenda for the IS field as a whole. This agenda emphasises the need for a focus on ethical goals, increased use of critical approaches, welcoming other disciplines with open arms, widening our field of study to many nontraditional settings and rejecting a dominant methodological paradigm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jit.2012.4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1057/jit.2009.29 · DOI
  2. 10.1057/ejis.2010.56 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/30036527 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bhatnagar S.C., 1990, Information Technology in Developing Countries
  5. 10.2307/25148796 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1057/ejis.2008.52 · DOI
  7. 10.17705/1jais.00215 · DOI
  8. 10.5040/9781350218161 · DOI
  9. 10.1287/isre.1090.0259 · DOI
  10. 10.1057/ejis.2011.1 · DOI
  11. 10.1057/jit.2011.19 · DOI
  12. 10.17705/1jais.00043 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/01972240802019970 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ekine S., 2010, SMS Uprising: Mobile Activism in Africa
  15. 10.17705/1jais.00040 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/20650290 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/20650273 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.05.001 · DOI
  19. Latour B., 2005, Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network- theory, 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1057/jit.2011.24 · DOI
  21. 10.17705/1jais.00051 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1080/17531050903273768 · DOI
  23. 10.1057/jit.2011.26 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/20650320 · DOI
  25. 10.1057/jit.2011.22 · DOI
  26. 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1057/ejis.2010.55 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Prahalad C.K., 2004, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid
  29. 10.17705/1jais.00042 · DOI
  30. 10.1057/ejis.2010.43 · DOI
  31. 10.1108/itp.2011.16124aaa.002 · DOI
  32. 10.1057/jit.2011.7 · DOI
  33. Unwin T., 2009, ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development
  34. Walsham G., 1993, Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations
  35. Walsham G., 2001, Making a World of Difference: IT in a global context
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00189.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Walsham, G.
Venue
Journal of Information Technology
Published
2012-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
87-93
ISSN
  • 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4437
OpenAlex
W2023102928
Cited by
309
References
2
FWCI
75.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.