The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Representative Claim
Open accessAbstract
Recent work on the idea of political representation has challenged effectively orthodox accounts of constituency and interests. However, discussions of representation need to focus more on its dynamics prior to further work on its forms. To that end, the idea of the representative claim is advanced and defended. Focusing on the representative claim helps us to: link aesthetic and cultural representation with political representation; grasp the importance of performance to representation; take non-electoral representation seriously; and to underline the contingency and contestability of all forms of representation. The article draws upon a range of sources and ideas to sketch a new, broader and more complex picture of the representative claim which — despite the complexity — helps us to reconnect representation theory to pressing real-world challenges.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From Saward's perspective, AI-generated interpretations may therefore be understood as representative claims whose legitimacy depends upon audience recognition and institutional validation rather than computational sophistication alone.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Individuals and institutions continually advance claims to speak for others, yet these claims become authoritative only when they are recognized by relevant audiences.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Authorization alone, however, does not permanently secure representative legitimacy.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Digital platforms, algorithmic systems, and generative AI increasingly participate in the production and circulation of religious knowledge”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“yet interpretive legitimacy continues to depend upon institutional authorization, representative mediation, communal recognition, and accountable governance [13,18,32,37].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
Fenichel Pitkin, H. (1967) · doi:10.1525/9780520340503 · Cited by 5,162
Young, I. M. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch19 · Cited by 4,295
Spivak, G. C., & (Germany), E. D. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003341567-11 · Cited by 4,226
The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin
Mansfield, H. C. (1969) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2147153 · Cited by 3,092
The Problem of Speaking for Others
Alcoff, L. (1991) · Cultural Critique · doi:10.2307/1354221 · Cited by 2,321
Mansbridge, J. J. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000856 · Cited by 1,917
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation
Przeworski, A. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175104 · Cited by 1,812
Phillips, A. (1998) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198294158.001.0001 · Cited by 1,602
Eckersley, R. (2004) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001 · Cited by 924
Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation
Street, J. (2004) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2004.00149.x · Cited by 635
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities, London: Verso.
- Ankersmit, F.R. (1996) Aesthetic Politics, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Barthes, R. (1985) The Responsibility of Forms, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press (trans. by R. Howard).
- Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (trans. by J.B. Thompson).
- Cohen, J. (1968) ‘Commentary: representation and the problem of identity’, in J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds.) Nomos X: Representation, New York: Atherton Press.
- Diggs, B.J. (1968) ‘Practical Representation’, in J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds.) Nomos X: Representation, New York: Atherton Press.
- Hall, S. (1997) ‘The Work of Representation’, in S. Hall (ed.) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London: Sage and The Open University.
- Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order, Cambridge: Polity.
- Marin, L. (2001) On Representation, Stanford: Stanford University Press (trans. by C. Porter).
- Mitchell, W.J.T. (1990) ‘Representation’, in F. Lentricchia and T. McLaughlin (eds.) Critical Terms for Literary Study, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
- Pennock, J.R. (1968) ‘Political Representation: an overview’, in J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds.) Nomos X: Representation, New York: Atherton Press.
- Riley, B. (2002) ‘Making Visible’, in R. Kudielka (ed.) Paul Klee: the nature of creation, London: Hayward Gallery.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12032 · Cited by 1,011
Goodin, R. E. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547944.001.0001 · Cited by 731
CARAMANI, D. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000538 · Cited by 709
Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors
Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x · Cited by 651
A “Selection Model” of Political Representation*
Mansbridge, J. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Authors
- Saward, M.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Saward, Michael
- ORCID
- Saward, Michael
- Venue
- Contemporary Political Theory
- Published
- 2006-07-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-318
- ISSN
- 1470-8914 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9336
- OpenAlex
- W2023827092
- Cited by
- 1,471
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 96 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 175 · 2018: 135 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 99.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Contemporary Political Theory (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- University of Warwick (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
- Keywords
- political representation, representative claims, constituency, interest, performance, representation theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
