The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
Abstract
The business environment of the 1990s demands significant changes in the way we do business. Simply formulating strategy is no longer sufficient; we must also design the processes to implement it effectively. The key to change is process innovation, a revolutionary new approach that fuses information technology and human resource management to improve business performance. The cornerstone to process innovation's dramatic results is information technology--a largely untapped resource, but a crucial enabler of process innovation. In turn, only a challenge like process innovation affords maximum use of information technology's potential. Davenport provides numerous examples of firms that have succeeded or failed in combining business change and technology initiatives. He also highlights the roles of new organizational structures and human resource programs in developing process innovation. Process innovation is quickly becoming the byword for industries ready to pull their companies out of modest growth patterns and compete effectively in the world marketplace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00133655 · Cited by 822
Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges
Berg, M. (2001) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00200-3 · Cited by 715
Gebert, H., Geib, M., Kolbe, L., & Brenner, W. (2003) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270310505421 · Cited by 491
How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility?
Lee, O.-K. (., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0577 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-04-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 30-4486-30-4486
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1605701154
- Cited by
- 4,378
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-4486
- The paper
- Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-4486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.