Cited by 2,217Information Systems Theories and ImplementationQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Doing interpretive research

Walsham, Geoff·2006·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Interpretive research in information systems (IS) is now a well-established part of the field. However, there is a need for more material on how to carry out such work from inception to publication. I published a paper a decade ago (Walsham, 1995) which addressed the nature of interpretive IS case studies and methods for doing such research. The current paper extends this earlier contribution, with a widened scope of all interpretive research in IS, and through further material on carrying out fieldwork, using theory and analysing data. In addition, new topics are discussed on constructing and justifying a research contribution, and on ethical issues and tensions in the conduct of interpretive work. The primary target audience for the paper is less-experienced IS researchers, but I hope that the paper will also stimulate reflection for the more-experienced IS researcher and be of relevance to interpretive researchers in other social science fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The author's data collection and analysis is centered on respondent-led accounts and triangulated with perspectives from other respondents, observation in the field and secondary data.

    “This method, termed a “historiography of images” in my PhD research (Masiero 2014), inspires my data collection and analysis, which is centered on respondent-led accounts of the phenomena under discussion and triangulated with perspectives from other respondents, observation in the field and secondary data according to the core principles of interpretive research (Walsham 2006).”

    From Biometric Infrastructures and the Indian Public Distribution System (2020) · cites this paper as Walsham 2006

  • Interpretive research is premised on the position that our knowledge of reality, rather than an appraisal of a unique and objective truth, is a social construction by human actors.

    “Interpretive research is premised on the position that our knowledge of reality, rather than an appraisal of a unique and objective truth, is a social construction by human actors (Walsham 2006).”

    From Biometric Infrastructures and the Indian Public Distribution System (2020) · cites this paper as Walsham 2006

  • To minimize salience bias and maintain critical distance, the transcriptions were cross-checked with the second author and a shared meaning was generated through multiple interactions with empirical data, theory, and the emergent coding schema.

    “On the other hand, to minimize salience bias as well as to maintain a critical distance between the personal use of Slack apps and integrations of the researchers and the views of interviewees, we cross-checked the transcriptions with the second author (not an active user of enterprise messengers) and generated a shared meaning through multiple interactions in which we engaged back and forth with”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsham, G.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Walsham, Geoff
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
2006-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
320-330
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W2126070475
Cited by
2,217
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 142 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 148 · 2012: 144
FWCI
129.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universitetet i Oslo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
interpretive research, information systems research, case studies, fieldwork, theory application, data analysis, scientific contributions, research ethics, research design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review