The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon
Abstract
Tailoring of methods is commonplace in the vast majority of software development projects and organisations. However, there is not much known about the tailoring and engineering of agile methods, or about how these methods can be used to complement each other. This study investigated tailoring of the agile methods, eXtreme programming (XP) and Scrum, at Intel Shannon, and involved experienced software engineers who continuously monitored and reflected on these methods over a 3-year period. The study shows that agile methods may individually be incomplete in supporting the overall development process, but XP and Scrum complement each other well, with XP providing support for technical aspects and Scrum providing support for project planning and tracking. The principles of XP and Scrum were carefully selected (only six of the 12 XP key practices were implemented, for example) and tailored to suit the needs of the development environment at Intel Shannon. Thus, the study refutes the suggestion that agile methods are not divisible or individually selectable but achieve their benefits through the synergistic combination of individual agile practices; rather, this study shows that an a la carte selection and tailoring of practices can work very well. In the case of Scrum, some local tailoring has led to a very committed usage by developers, in contrast to many development methods whose usage is limited despite being decreed mandatory by management. The agile practices that were applied did lead to significant benefits, including reductions in code defect density by a factor of 7. Projects of 6-month and 1-year duration have been delivered ahead of schedule, which bodes well for future ability to accurately plan development projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Designing qualitative research
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1232 · Cited by 9,905
Designing Qualitative Research
McQuarrie, E. F., Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1990) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172595 · Cited by 6,059
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,902
A spiral model of software development and enhancement
Boehm, B. W. (1988) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.59 · Cited by 4,972
The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248684 · Cited by 4,716
Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method
Walsham, G. (1995) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.1995.9 · Cited by 3,834
No Silver Bullet Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering
Brooks (1987) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1987.1663532 · Cited by 3,186
Cited by
Clarke, P., & O’Connor, R. V. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.003 · Cited by 332
Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development
Vidgen, R., & Wang, X. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0237 · Cited by 331
Continuous software engineering and beyond: trends and challenges
Fitzgerald, B., & Stol, K.-J. (2014) · Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2593812.2593813 · Cited by 212
Self-citationDevOps Capabilities, Practices, and Challenges: Insights from a Case Study
Senapathi, M., Buchan, J., & Osman, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018 · doi:10.1145/3210459.3210465 · Cited by 172
The sensemaking-coevolution-implementation theory of software design
Ralph, P. (2015) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.11.007 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G., & Conboy, K.
- Venue
- European Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 200-213
- ISSN
- 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9344
- OpenAlex
- W2052693341
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 59.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000605
- The paper
- Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G., & Conboy, K. (2006). Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. European Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.