Cited by 65Customer churn and segmentationCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyInsurance and Financial Risk Management

Customer retention in the insurance industry: Using survival analysis to predict cross-selling opportunities

Harrison, Tina, Ansell, Jake·2002·Journal of Financial Services Marketing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4770054

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, T., & Ansell, J.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Tina
Venue
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
Published
2002-03
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
229-239
ISSN
  • 1363-0539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1846
OpenAlex
W2056493025
Cited by
65
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Financial Services Marketing (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Southampton
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Keywords
customer retention, cross-selling, insurance industry, survival analysis, saturated markets, financial institutions, data warehouse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review