Cited by 81Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyCustomer churn and segmentationConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Consumer responses to dissatisfaction with financial service providers: An exploration of why some stay while others switch

Panther, Tracy, Farquhar, Jillian Dawes·2004·Journal of Financial Services Marketing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4770131

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panther, T., & Farquhar, J. D.
Affiliations
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Corresponding author
Panther, Tracy
Venue
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
Published
2004-06
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
343-353
ISSN
  • 1363-0539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1846
OpenAlex
W2028028374
Cited by
81
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Financial Services Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
customer dissatisfaction, financial services, customer loyalty, exit and voice, service dissatisfaction, consumer behavior, customer retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review