Cited by 430Global and Cross-Cultural ManagementCultural Differences and ValuesInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

The cross-cultural research imperative: the need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity

Tung, Rosalie L·2008·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400331

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tung, R. L.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Tung, Rosalie L
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
41-46
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2021344902
Cited by
430
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
89.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
cross-cultural research, work values, cultural homogeneity, cultural change, cultural paradox, workplace diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review