The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 14 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation
Open accessAbstract
Firms are social communities that specialize in the creation and internal transfer of knowledge. The multinational corporation arises not out of the failure of markets for the buying and selling of knowledge, but out of its superior efficiency as an organizational vehicle by which to transfer this knowledge across borders. We test the claim that firms specialize in the internal transfer of tacit knowledge by empirically examining the decision to transfer the capability to manufacture new products to wholly owned subsidiaries or to other parties. The empirical results show that the less codifiable and the harder to teach is the technology, the more likely the transfer will be to wholly owned operations. This result implies that the choice of transfer mode is determined by the efficiency of the multinational corporation in transferring knowledge relative to other firms, not relative to an abstract market transaction. The notion of the firm as specializing in the transfer and recombination of knowledge is the foundation to an evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
60 Own interpretation · 9 Own result · 8 Own method · 7 No full text of the sources · 5 Sources not found · 5 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“strong support was found for the proposition that the choice of transfer mode is explained by the degree of tacitness of technology.”
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
“They consistently show that the more tacit the technology is, the more likely it will be transferred to a wholly owned subsidiary.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Abstract
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The empirical results show that the less codifiable and the harder to teach is the technology, the more likely the transfer will be to wholly owned operations.”
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
“They consistently show that the more tacit the technology is, the more likely it will be transferred to a wholly owned subsidiary.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The following investigation is meant to show that knowledge that is difficult to codify or teach and is also complex will tend to be transferredwithin the firm.”
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
“The positive coefficient to Complexity indicates that as technologies increase in their complexity, they are more likely to be transferred to wholly owned subsidiaries.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ourresults suggest, though, that there remains a distinguishable boundary in the knowledge between the partner firms.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also partitionedthe sample by groupingjoint venturesand wholly owned subsidiaries together.The significance levels of the coefficients deteriorated.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effect of age of the technology is insignificant.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The above results provide support for the contention that firms specialize in the transfer of knowledge that is difficult to understandand codify.”
- Also stated in: § 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming]. · hedged
“Ourfindings suggesting that firms specialize in the transfer of relatively tacit and idiosyncratic knowledge are consistent with this broader evolutionary perspective.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming]. · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The coefficients to the variables Codifiabilityand Teachabilityarenegative and significant, indicating that as the knowledge becomes more codified and more easily taught, the more likely it will be transferred to a third party rather than to a wholly owned subsidiary.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What firms do is to specialize in the creation and transfer of specialized knowledge.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The positive coefficient to Complexity indicates that as technologies increase in their complexity, they are more likely to be transferred to wholly owned subsidiaries.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 25
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge is transferredby joint ventures, but for uncodified knowledge, the preferred vehicle is transfer between wholly owned units.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of previous transfers is negatively related to transfer to wholly owned subsidiaries, contrary to expectation, but the relationship is insignificant.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The multinational corporation arises not out of the failure of markets for the buying and selling of knowledge, but out of its superior efficiency as an organizational vehicle by which to transfer this knowledge across borders.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firms are social communities that specialize in the creation and internal transfer of knowledge.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is difficult to discuss and analyze the growth of the firm, and its boundaries, in the context of comparative statics.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, these costs are derived from the efforts of codifying and teaching complex knowledge to recipients; more efforts must be expended, the less capable the user.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > DIRECT INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGEAS A PUBLIC GOOD
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And surely, when such a decision is considered, an importantaspect would be the extent to which a firm has an advantage in specialized knowledge of cooperating with agents and the extent to which their shared knowledge will further accumulate and provide platforms for future opportunities.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Horizontal foreign direct investment is, therefore, the transferof knowledge within the firm and across borders, and in this regard, such transfers are the primary expression of the growth of the firm.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another interpretation,rarely discussed in the literature,is that technologies that are difficult to codify also representplatforms for expansion into future markets.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple respondents for an innovation were not used, though, for some questionnaires, one individual scored the basic information and another answered the section dealing with the manufacturing process.(As the questions did not reflect on the respondent's performance, the risk of misattributionis low.)”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A response rate of 80% was attained; the remaining 20% were similar in size and industry affiliation to the responding organizations.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By our results, tacitness will increase the costs of transfer and decrease the speed by which knowledge is transferred within the firm or between partners.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What our propositions and empirical tests have sought to put forth is the view that the attributes of knowledge influence the decision of where to draw the boundaries of the firm.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, the decision to license is not simply based on the costs of this made relative to an internal transfer; it is also influenced by the expectation of revenues that would be foregone by failing to accumulate experiential knowledge in the foreign market.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We include these additional two variables in our estimations, as it is unlikely that the three scales measuring codifiability, teachability, and complexity (or any set of measures) can fully specify the tacitness of technology.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These findings are perfectly consistent with Teece's discovery that the costs of transfer vary widely.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Teece
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, it is reasonable to conclude that age and previous transfers act as proxies for a latent variable of tacitness; once more direct measures are provided, their influence should disappear.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These costs declined with each subsequent transfer and with the experience of the recipient of the technology.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > DIRECT INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGEAS A PUBLIC GOOD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece [1977] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Davidson and McFetridge [1984] similarly found that transferto unaffiliatedrecipients is promoted if the firm has transferred technology in the past.However, experience in internal transfers encourages more internal transfers in the future.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Experience with the technology again points to the important relationship between the currentstate of knowledge andlearningcapabilitiesof the adopter.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Davidson and McFetridge [1984] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Competition among firms is based upon their differential capabilities, and their abilities to expand by the creation and replication of new knowledge faster than the imitative and innovative efforts of competitors.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The cost of the transfer of technologies should differ among firms, and these differences should have an effect on the desirability to transfer technology within the firm or by license, independent of the issue of opportunism.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > DIRECT INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGEAS A PUBLIC GOOD
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firms compete on the basis of the superiority of their information and know-how, and their abilities to develop new knowledge by experiential learning.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In its more advanced evolution, this process alters the global knowledge of the firm and may result in its transformationtowards a network of subsidiaries characterized by the cross-border transfer of learning.20”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [20] 20. Semi-Synthetic Penicillin:PENGLOBE1970 (ASTRA) 24. Selective Beta-Blocker:SELOKEN1970 (HASSLE/ASTRA) 25. Roller Bearing: CC 1972 (SKF)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sense, the view that we put forth is compatible with an evolutionary perspective on the growth of the firm.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One interpretationof this result is that firms are able to transfer these technologies at a lower cost to wholly owned subsidiaries than to third parties.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Contractor[1981] found thattechnologytransfer(via licensing) increases with the number of other firms using a technology, suggesting that spillovers can create a generalized and cumulative capability in its use.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Experience with the technology again points to the important relationship between the currentstate of knowledge andlearningcapabilitiesof the adopter.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Contractor [1981]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The standardizationof evaluation systems and procedures is an expression of the shared knowledge, values, and assumptions and eases the transfer of knowledge within the firm.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Experience with the technology again points to the important relationship between the currentstate of knowledge andlearningcapabilitiesof the adopter.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These scales measure the latent construct of the tacitness of knowledge.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At any point in time, given the current stock of knowledge of the firm, managers will face the problem of deciding how to service a foreign market: by license, export, or direct investment.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > 16. The validation of the questionnaire design and the reliability and validity of the constructs are discussed in detail in Zander [1991a] and Zander and Kogut [forthcoming].
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the same time, novel technologies are likely to be less codified.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Discriminant validity could not be tested by factor analysis, but a comparison within and between correlations of the items indicated reasonably strong discrimination.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Construction of the Measures
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings lend themselves to the interpretationthatthe experience in internal transfers is codified in a way idiosyncratic to the firm, but once a firm has invested in codifying knowledge for the purpose of licensing, external transfers are subsequently promoted.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Experience with the technology again points to the important relationship between the currentstate of knowledge andlearningcapabilitiesof the adopter.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a seminal paper, Teece [1977] established that technology is not a public good, estimating the costs of transfer to range from 2% to 59% of total costs of the twenty-seven projects he analyzed.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > DIRECT INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGEAS A PUBLIC GOOD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece [1977] source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The more complex a manufacturing technology, the more difficult it should be to transfer or to imitate.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But what is more important, the second point suggests a notion of team skills independentof individualswhich is difficult to reconcile with a belief that internalization defines the boundary of the firm.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One explanation is simply that such a procedure grouped fifty-three cases of transfer into the joint venture/wholly owned category, and only twentynine into the licensing/contract choice; given the sample size, this imbalance may have affected the results.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
hedgedconditionaln = 53- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The problem with the argument that the firm exists due to market failure is that it is overdetermined; the assumption of opportunism is not needed, only the differential in costs in the transmission of knowledge within the firm as opposed to between firms.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > DIRECT INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGEAS A PUBLIC GOOD
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We recognize that this test is by no means fully specified.In particular,we do not look at the capabilities of the recipient.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The 35 Swedish innovations and 82 transfer cases are representative of technology transfer by multinational corporations generally.
“The innovations were identified from a studyby Walhmark andMcQueen [1986] on 100 majorSwedish innovations.”
“The sample size of the tests thus consists of the eightytwo instances of the transfer of the capability to manufacture.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Markets are imperfect even if they rarely fail, and human behavior can be motivated by self-interest.
“Markets, even if they rarely fail, are imperfect; human behavior can be motivated by self-interest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Knowledge transfer is not trivial even within the firm.
“That the transfer of knowledge is not trivial even within the firm is a fundamental observation.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > Results
“The number of previous transfers is negatively related to transfer to wholly owned subsidiaries, contrary to expectation, but the relationship is insignificant.”
§ KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION > AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
“As a secondary interest, we test the variables of the age and previous times transferred,as suggested by Teece and others, and predict a negative relationship to the choice of wholly owned subsidiaries.”
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
O'Brien, D. P., & Williamson, O. E. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230812 · Cited by 13,469
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Self-citationTransaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations
Williamson, O. E. (1979) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466942 · Cited by 10,190
An evolutionary theory of economic change
Winter, & Sidney, G. (1982) · Cited by 6,343
Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Frontmatter
Casson, M., & Caves, R. (1984) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511619113 · Cited by 3,745
Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives
Kogut, B. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090403 · Cited by 3,333
Self-citationMarkets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
Ouchi, W. G., & Williamson, O. E. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392191 · Cited by 2,733
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [7]7. Quintus Type Steel Press for Use in the ASEA-STORA Process 1962 (ASEA)
- [15]15. Isostatic Press for Steel Processing 1967 (ASEA)
- [33]33. Casson, Mark. 1987. Thefirmnand the mlarket.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- [39]39. Hall, G. & R. Johnson. 1970. Transfers of United Aerospace Technology to Japan. In Raymond Vernon, editor, The technology factor in international trade. New York: Columbia University Press.
- [44]44. Hymer, Stephen. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct investment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (reprint of Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economics, MIT, 1960).
- [45]45. Johnson, Harry. 1970. The efficiency and welfare implications of the multinational corporation. In Charles Kindleberger, editor, The international corporation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- [53]53. Nunnally, John C. 1978 (second edition). Psychomletric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
- [55]55. Rogers, Everett. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,001–3,100 of 3,993
Hamida, L. B. (2016) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9548-1.ch011 · Cited by 1
Khalid, S., & Larimo, J. A. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230305106_2 · Cited by 1
Determinanten von Offshore-Outsourcing-Aktivitäten im deutschen Mittelstand
Hecker, A. (2009) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/bf03372826 · Cited by 1
リソース・リポジショニング・フレームによる新興国市場戦略の分析視角
Tetsuya, U. S. U. I. (2015) · doi:10.15050/jaibs.7.2_25 · Cited by 1
FDI Uppers and Downers: A Macedonian Case Study
Apostolov, M. (2017) · New Global Studies · doi:10.1515/ngs-2017-0010 · Cited by 1
Won, Y. J., & Rhee, J. H. (2017) · 전략경영연구 · doi:10.17786/jsm.2017.20.1.001 · Cited by 1
Analogbei, M. (2013) · Liverpool John Moores University · Cited by 1
Eine Geschäftsmöglichkeit – ein Unternehmer – ein Land und dann die Welt
Märk, S., & Situm, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18740-8_8 · Cited by 1
A RELAÇÃO MATRIZ-SUBSIDIÁRIAS E A TEORIA DAS MULTINACIONAIS: um estudo bibliométrico
Valentim, P. P., Maia, V. M., & Paula, F. D. O. (2017) · Caderno de Administração · doi:10.4025/cadadm.v25i2.39308 · Cited by 1
Integrated Risk Management in Multinational Corporations
Zhao, L., & Huchzermeier, A. (2018) · EURO advanced tutorials on operational research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76663-8_4 · Cited by 1
Fighting Knowledge Sharing Hostility in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan
Kozhakhmet, S., Nazri, M., & Jayasingam, S. (2017) · Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review · doi:10.12816/0040334 · Cited by 1
Buccieri, D. (2018) · EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University) · Cited by 1
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND THE INTERNATIONALIZATION PROCESS OF AN EMERGING MULTINATIONAL
Martignago, G., Cário, S. A. F., & Alperstedt, G. D. (2018) · Revista de Negócios · doi:10.7867/1980-4431.2018v23n1p7-30 · Cited by 1
SE-MABKM: An Epoch For Organization Knowledge Management
Sinha, R. R., & Lamba, C. S. (2011) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science · doi:10.26483/ijarcs.v2i5.781 · Cited by 1
Safavi, M., & Håkanson, L. (2013) · Cited by 1
Soutinho, L. C., Rosário, F. J. P., & de Lima, A. A. (2019) · REVISTA ECONOMIA POLÍTICA DO DESENVOLVIMENTO · doi:10.28998/repd.v6i18.8660 · Cited by 1
Latukha, M. O., Selivanovskikh, L. V., & MacLennan, M. L. F. (2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1745-886220190000014022 · Cited by 1
Paradigm Change in the History of the Pharmaceutical Industry
Edris, S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9350-2_9 · Cited by 1
Equity Entry Mode and Enterprise Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Zhang, T. (2019) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2019.712016 · Cited by 1
The dynamics between internationalization strategies and innovative performance within ICT companies
Ximenes, P., Cabral, J. E. D. O., Tassigny, M., Câmara, S., & Tavares, J. C. D. S. (2020) · Revista de Administração da UFSM · doi:10.5902/1983465929229 · Cited by 1
Martínez‐Noya, A., Canal, E. G., & Guillén, M. F. (2010) · Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) · Cited by 1
Claude-Gaudillat, V., & Quélin, B. V. (2006) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 1
Baharudin, D. M., Marimuthu, M., & Shahimi, S. (2021) · Business Management and Strategy · doi:10.5296/bms.v12i2.18584 · Cited by 1
Nuno, D. G. (2008) · UTA ResearchCommons (University of Texas Arlington) · Cited by 1
Øian, J.-T., Kuivalainen, O., & Vanninen, H. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781788976114.00008 · Cited by 1
Dellestrand, H. (2017) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2016.12.004 · Cited by 1
Danish multinational corporations in China: an evolutionary approach to internationalisation
Haakonsson, S. J. (2017) · International Journal of Multinational Corporation Strategy · doi:10.1504/ijmcs.2017.10006038 · Cited by 1
Jones, G. G. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199272093.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Simbe, D. F. M. (2022) · Scientific Journal of Applied Social and Clinical Science · doi:10.22533/at.ed.2162122211071 · Cited by 1
The international business landscape: a look at paradigms, research gaps and new realities
Ntara, C. (2022) · International Trade Politics and Development · doi:10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006 · Cited by 2
How Transformational Leaders Can Effectively Manage Knowledge in Companies
Sayyadi, M. (2022) · International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations · doi:10.4018/ijkbo.314461 · Cited by 1
Multinational Firms and the Pattern and Structure of Foreign Direct Investment
Fuchs, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24513-8_5 · Cited by 1
Reimagining That Translators and Translations Make a Difference
Røvik, K. A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198832362.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Røvik, K. A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198832362.003.0002 · Cited by 2
Perin, F. S., & Paranhos, J. (2023) · Latin American Business Review · doi:10.1080/10978526.2023.2263390 · Cited by 2
Examining the Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Malaysia's Manufacturing Sector's Competitive Advantage
Loong, A. H., Madli, F., Voo, I. C., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i9/18884 · Cited by 1
Managing international knowledge flows at the fuzzy front end of discontinuous innovation
NEUKMAN, M., & Guittard, C. (2023) · Management international · doi:10.59876/a-7ast-rs7p · Cited by 1
Spiral Forward: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Chinese Post-merger Autonomy Integration
Yang, Y. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241282119 · Cited by 1
“Previous research has considered firms as knowledge-processing institutions, hypothesizing that firms would select operation modes that enable maximum knowledge-flowing efficiency (Kogut & Zander, 1993; O’Higgins et al., 2022).”
Integration of Indian inventor networks in global value chains in pharmaceuticals industry
Gosain, A., & Ray, S. (2024) · Innovation and Development · doi:10.1080/2157930x.2024.2413750 · Cited by 1
“Prior research suggests that global R&D portfolios may help firms overcome geographical constraints and access distant knowledge (Kogut and Zander 1993).”
Manzoor, A., & Zhang, B. (2024) · Journal of Data Information and Management · doi:10.1007/s42488-024-00138-9 · Cited by 1
“Kogut and Zander (1993) stated that achieving team performance is not dependent on tangible resources but significantly relies on knowledge-based activities.”
Han, G.-R., & Lee, J.-E. (2025) · Cross Cultural & Strategic Management · doi:10.1108/ccsm-09-2023-0198 · Cited by 1
Multidimensional nature of the absorptive capacity: an analysis of the Latin American countries
Querino, F. F., Calegário, C. L. L., & Souza, L. C. R. E. (2025) · Review of International Business and Strategy · doi:10.1108/ribs-09-2023-0110 · Cited by 1
Chaudhary, M. K., Dhungana, M., & Bohara, B. (2025) · Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.3126/njmr.v8i3.80358 · Cited by 1
From Stages to Phases, A Theory of Small Developing Country Internationalization
Williams, N. L., Ridgman, T. W., & Shi, Y. (2011) · Advances in international management · doi:10.1108/s1571-5027(2011)0000024018 · Cited by 1
Can policy follow the dynamics of global innovation platforms
van der Giessen, A. M., Stolwijk, C. C. M., & Leijten, J. (2015) · Cited by 1
Cai, H., & Gűney, Y. (2010) · Cited by 1
Sutthijakra, S., & Ubon, A. N. (2010) · Cited by 1
What Top 25 Most Cited JIBS Articles Can Tell Us About The Firm’s Internationalization Process?
Brambilla, F. R. (2014) · Desenvolvimento em Questão · doi:10.21527/2237-6453.2014.28.68-103 · Cited by 1
Global Sourcing of Business Services: A Coevolutionary Analysis
Massini, S., & Lewin, A. Y. (2012) · Research methodology in strategy and management · doi:10.1108/s1479-8387(2012)0000008015 · Cited by 1
Determinants of out‐licensing strategy of firms: New empirical evidence
Kwon, Y., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Asian Journal of Technology Innovation · doi:10.1080/19761597.2010.9668681 · Cited by 1
Internationale Markteintrittsstrategien – Eine State-of-the-Art-Betrachtung
Schramm‐Klein, H. (2012) · Gabler Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-3504-5_2 · Cited by 1
Leadership Development and Knowledge Sharing in MNEs
Espedal, B., & Gooderham, P. N. (2013) · Beta · doi:10.18261/issn1504-3134-2013-01-03 · Cited by 1
Why IJV over WOS? Home country effect on the US and Japanese MNEs
Jung, J. C., & Suh, T. (2013) · Journal of Asia Business Studies · doi:10.1108/15587891311319440 · Cited by 1
The Analysis and Countermeasures Research of Virtual Enterprise Asymmetric Knowledge Sharing
Cheng-xian, Y., Huo-quan, C., & Dong-qiang, G. (2011) · doi:10.1109/ncis.2011.148 · Cited by 1
Keshari, P. K. (2015) · India studies in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0083-6_7 · Cited by 1
Lupilya, E. C., & Hun, P. J. (2015) · The Korean Journal of Policy Studies · doi:10.52372/kjps30305 · Cited by 1
Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H., & Stucki, T. (2016) · Economics · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2016-12 · Cited by 1
김정권 (2013) · The Journal of International Trade & Commerce · doi:10.16980/jitc.9.6.201311.305 · Cited by 1
The Intangible Assets of Korean Manufacturing Firms for Foreign Direct Investment
Hong, S. (2004) · East Asian Economic Review · doi:10.11644/kiep.jeai.2004.8.2.125 · Cited by 1
신정용, 조정구, & Koh, Y.-K. (2010) · 통상정보연구 · doi:10.15798/kaici.12.1.201003.123 · Cited by 1
Pereira, A. J., & Dathein, R. (2016) · Revista Brasileira de Inovação · doi:10.20396/rbi.v15i1.8649119 · Cited by 1
Corte, V. D., & Gaudio, G. D. (2016) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v11n6p205 · Cited by 1
Verlag, G., & Andersen, O. (1997) · Cited by 1
Foss, N. J. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199240647.003.0008 · Cited by 1
Conclusions and Policy Implications
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26467-4_14 · Cited by 1
Hennart, J. (2013) · Advances in international management · doi:10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026006 · Cited by 1
Modularization (MD) and IT in Auto Industry
Lian, Y., & Weisfeld‐Spolter, S. (2015) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-7332-8.ch002 · Cited by 1
Migrants, institutional change and the geography of foreign direct investment
Shukla, P. (2016) · doi:10.7282/t36t0q0x · Cited by 1
Zuliani, R. (2014) · Share Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam · doi:10.22373/share.v3i2.1337 · Cited by 1
A Study of Retail Format Strategy Deployed by Southeast Asia Regional Retailers
Sahara, T., & Watanabe, T. (2016) · International Journal of Marketing & Distribution · doi:10.5844/jsmd.18.2_77 · Cited by 1
Liabilities of Distance: Governance Cost Dynamics in MNE Headquarters–Subsidiary Relationships
Tomassen, S. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1745-886220170000012023 · Cited by 1
Firm Resources, Institutional Distance, and the Choice of Entry Mode
Puck, J. F., Hödl, M. K., Filatotchev, I. V., & Lindner, T. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1745-886220170000012019 · Cited by 2
Purkayastha, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6505-7_27 · Cited by 1
Rickley, M. (2018) · European J of International Management · doi:10.1504/ejim.2018.10014758 · Cited by 1
Do Investor Origins Affect Private Equity Investment Syndicates? A Case from India
Gemson, J., Creighton, M. D., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2019) · The Journal of Private Equity · doi:10.3905/jpe.2019.1.082 · Cited by 1
Canal, E. G., Lorda, P. S., & Llaneza, A. V. (2019) · European J of International Management · doi:10.1504/ejim.2020.10020957 · Cited by 1
MNE’s THEORY AND GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS
Rogach, O. (2019) · ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS · doi:10.17721/apmv.2018.138.0.153-162 · Cited by 1
Knowledge Acquisition of Local Managers: Its Antecedents and Effectiveness
Thanh, L. D. T., & Nguyen, L. A. (2016) · Journal of Economics and Development · doi:10.33301/2016.18.03.04 · Cited by 1
ANTECEDENTS OF SUCCESS IN A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONSORTIUM
DOMINGUEZ-BLANCO, J., Castro, I., & Cepeda‐Carrión, G. (2019) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919621500018 · Cited by 1
Framework for Cross-Site Learning to Enable Knowledge Transfer in Production Networks
Schuh, G., Prote, J. P., Gützlaff, A., et al. (2019) · International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC) · doi:10.1109/iestec46403.2019.00072 · Cited by 1
Szász, L., Rácz, B.-G., Borza, A., & Benedek, B. (2019) · Acta Oeconomica · doi:10.1556/032.2019.69.s2.5
Yamao, S., & Fenwick, M. S. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.4225/03/593779a60b4f5 · Cited by 1
To acquire or not to acquire: the effects of acquisitions in the software industry
Méndez‐Ortega, C., & Teruel, M. (2020) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-020-00670-y · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, the acquisition process leading to the adoption of knowledge is characterized by the uncertainty in applicability of any new technology (Saxton and Dollinger 2004; Schweizer 2005) or in tacit knowledge of the acquired personnel (Grant 1996; Kogut and Zander 1993).”
BackgroundClarifying Key Terms and Philosophical Foundations of Transaction Cost Economics
Peng, G. Z. (2020) · International Marketing and Management Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46878-1_2 · Cited by 1
Knowledge Transfer Across Types of Assignments: Case study of an International Oil Company
Jawad, A. M. (2020) · International Journal of Human Resource Studies · doi:10.5296/ijhrs.v10i4.17840 · Cited by 1
Affinité politique et choix du mode de propriété lors d’acquisitions transfrontalières
Peillex, J., Yoon, H. D., & Rouine, I. (2020) · Management international · doi:10.7202/1074363ar · Cited by 1
Pescanova S. A. (1960-1973): entre la iniciativa privada y el empuje del Estado
Rivero, J. G., & Bello, M. D. C. E. (2021) · Revista de historia industrial · doi:10.1344/rhiihr.v30i83.31714 · Cited by 1
Sharing Expertise within the MNC Is Increasingly Fluid and Challenging
Hakkarainen, T. (2021) · AIB Insights · doi:10.46697/001c.29913 · Cited by 1
Kabir, M. N. (2019) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-34809-8_5 · Cited by 1
Memar, N., Andersson, U. R., & Gillmore, E. (2022) · The Academy of International Business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95527-4_9 · Cited by 1
INTERNACIONALIZAÇÃO DE GRUPO EMPRESARIAL DE GESTÃO DE MARCAS EM PRODUTOS LOGOMARCADOS
Capelache, C., & Júnior, A. D. M. (2022) · Revista Práticas em Contabilidade e Gestão · doi:10.5935/2319-0485/praticas.v9n3e14973 · Cited by 1
Introduction au dossier thématique
Nivoix, S., & Dikmen, L. (2021) · Management international · doi:10.7202/1086408ar · Cited by 1
Vayle, A., & Jell‐Ojobor, M. (2023) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18134-4_16 · Cited by 1
Роль эго-сети фрилансера в увеличении его накопленного капитала
Картузова, М. В., Казбековна, З. И., & Наильевна, С. А. (2022) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2022.6.2284 · Cited by 1
Steen, C. R., Nesheim, T., & Olsen, K. M. (2023) · Beta · doi:10.18261/beta.37.1.1 · Cited by 1
Führung von Rückkehrern aus dem Ausland zur Unterstützung des Wissenstransfers
Bucher, J., Burmeister, A., & Deller, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68185-5_38 · Cited by 1
Shared Knowledge and Production of Product Innovation
Lopes, J. B., Camilo, S. P. O., & Yamaguchi, C. K. (2021) · International Journal of Humanities and Social Science · doi:10.30845/ijhss.v11n11p1 · Cited by 1
The Collaborative Entrepreneurship Process : a Large Firm Perspective
Karlsson, S. C., & Nilsson, J. (2015) · Cited by 1
Santipitaksakul, S. (2010) · WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) · doi:10.34737/907w2 · Cited by 1
New Perspectives on Rewards and Knowledge Sharing
Bock, G., Siew, C. W., & Kim, Y. (2005) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch372 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kogut, B., & Zander, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of International Business Studies
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 625-645
- ISSN
- 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-6990
- OpenAlex
- W3152457815
- Cited by
- 3,967
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 166 · 2016: 164 · 2015: 196 · 2014: 222 · 2013: 220 · 2012: 214
- FWCI
- 43.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- multinational corporations, evolutionary theory of the firm, tacit knowledge, knowledge transfer, wholly owned subsidiaries, firm specialization, internal knowledge transfer, technology transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
