Cited by 93International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

Managing valuable knowledge in weak IP protection countries

Berry, Heather·2017·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41267-017-0072-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 98 · Cited by 93

Authors
Berry, H.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Berry, Heather
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2017-03-20
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
787-807
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2602062421
Cited by
93
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9
FWCI
17.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Commerce
  • George Washington University
  • Mack Institute for Innovation Management, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
knowledge management, intellectual property protection, multinational corporations, expatriates, knowledge transfer, institutional weakness, knowledge assets, institutional theory, expatriate management, manufacturing capability, knowledge capabilities, US multinationals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review