Cited by 149International Business and FDIGlobalization, Economics, and PoliciesGlobal trade and economics

The future of international business research on corporate globalization that never was…

Open access
Verbeke, Alain, Coeurderoy, Régis, Matt, Tanja·2018·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41267-018-0192-2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 46 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Globalization produces feelings of discontent.

    “Globalization does generate feelings of discontent (Stiglitz, 2002(Stiglitz, , 2017)), and a variety of ''de-globalization'' forces have gained at least some momentum around the world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stiglitz, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stiglitz, 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    For certain core activities, including head-office functions, the country of origin remains as important today as it was 200 years ago, even for the world's largest companies.

    “For at least some key activities, such as core head office functions, home country origin matters as much now as it did two centuries ago, even in the world's largest firms (Coeurderoy & Verbeke, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Coeurderoy & Verbeke, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Greater internationalization yields net efficiency benefits.

    “The fact is that increased internationalization results in net-efficiency benefits.”
    • Also stated in: § THE GLOBALIZATION THEME · boosted
      “Such types of outcomes have been clearly demonstrated in a large number of recent articles published in JIBS (see, inter alia, Berry, 2017;Brandl, Darendeli, & Mudambi, 2018;Ellis, Moeller, Schlingemann, & Stulz, 2017;Kano, 2018;Kim, Pevzner, & Xin, 2018;Koning, Mertens, & Roosenboom, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunning, 1958

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Berry, 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brandl, Darendeli, & Mudambi, 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Interdependency among countries is still rising despite the 2008 recession and talk of globalization's demise.

    “The latest figures from the World Trade Organization suggest that the interdependency among countries is still rising, despite the 2008 great recession and much ''noise'' about the demise of globalization (WTO, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites WTO, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    Almost none of the largest global companies can attain and maintain, over time, an even worldwide spread of their operations and revenues.

    “Few -if any -of the world's largest firms command the capabilities to achieve, and to sustain over longer periods of time, a balanced, global geographic distribution of their activities and sales.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The principal limits on corporate globalization, when endogenous, generally stem from bounded rationality, bounded reliability, and failure to build an organizational setting that supports value creation; these worsen as geographic and product scope expands.

    “The main constraints on corporate globalization have been documented in a large and wide-ranging literature, and to the extent that these constraints are endogenous, they can usually be reduced to challenges of bounded rationality, bounded reliability, and the inability to create an organizational context conducive to value creation in its entirety, all of which become exacerbated as the firm”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rugman & Verbeke, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Verbeke & Kano, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Narula & Verbeke, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Globalization tendencies have unfolded through non-linear processes, with drivers and impacts still debated.

    “Business historians have shown that globalization tendencies, though deeply rooted in the history of various human civilizations, have unfolded through non-linear processes and with drivers and impacts that are still vigorously debated (Hopkins, 2002;O'Rourke & Williamson, 2002;Jones, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hopkins, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites O'Rourke & Williamson, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jones, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Knowledge on corporate globalization is much more limited than is commonly assumed in the IB field and beyond.

    “The immediate outcome of such ''accuracy-focused'' approach would undoubtedly be the recognition that knowledge on corporate globalization is much more limited that what is commonly assumed in the IB field and beyond.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chang, Kogut and Yang (2016) replicated Denis et al. (2002) using Compustat complemented with Orbis data, but data availability was equally restrictive, so they also used a dummy variable for corporate globalization.

    “Recently, Chang, Kogut and Yang (2016) replicated Denis et al.'s (2002) article.They complemented the Compustat data, with data from another -more recent -database, namely Orbis, which includes companies from around the world.But data availability appeared equally restrictive and the authors faced the same constraints as before.They therefore also addressed corporate globalization through usage of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chang et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In corporate globalization research, detailed studies must exclude many cases with missing data, whereas large-sample studies depend on flawed proxies.

    “A third empirical caveat concerns sample selection.On the one hand, authors who try to engage in a fine-grained analysis of corporate globalization have little choice than to eliminate many cases lacking the requisite information.As a result, Hitt, Hoskisson and Kim (1997) built their analysis on 295 US firms from the Compustat database; Qian, Li and Rugman (2013) used 167 Canadian firms; Hashai (”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hitt, Hoskisson and Kim (1997)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Qian, Li and Rugman (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hashai (2011)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Denis et al. (2002) used 44,288 firm-years from 7,520 firms and Chang et al. (2016) used 12,640 firm-years from 3,002 firms, indicating that many companies were eliminated even though corporate globalization was measured only by a dummy variable.

    “In the first article, Denis et al. (2002) managed to build upon a sample of 44,288 firm-years associated with 7520 firms.In the second article, Chang et al. (2016) used a sample of 12,640 firm years associated with 3002 firms.Considering the very large size of these databases, one can only conclude that the authors felt compelled to eliminate a large number of companies, even though they used only”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Denis et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chang et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such indices are informative only at the extremes; at intermediate levels, where most internationally active firms sit, interpretation is difficult.

    “The main weakness of this approach, unsurprisingly, is again, that this type of index can be meaningful at the extremes, but is more difficult to interpret when taking on intermediate scores (where most internationally operating firms are positioned).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both conceptual appraisal and empirical measurement of corporate globalization are difficult.

    “Corporate globalization is not only difficult to appraise conceptually, but its actual measurement is equally challenging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The introduction of concepts such as born globals and global value chains has enriched IB debate on international entry and operations but has also muddled understanding of what corporate globalization implies.

    “Here, the introduction of concepts such as born globals and global value chains may have enriched the debate in IB research on the various forms of international entry and operations, but it has also further muddled the waters on what corporate globalization actually implies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Rugman and Verbeke (2004) set thresholds for global status: no less than 20% of sales in each broad triad region and below 50% in any single region.

    “Rugman and Verbeke (2004) The future of international business research proposed the following thresholds: Global firms were defined as having sales of at least 20% in each of the three regions of the broad triad of North America, Europe and Asia, but with less than 50% in any one of these regions (especially the home region).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rugman and Verbeke (2004) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most data used in corporate globalization studies come from external sources and provide only limited information on MNEs' international activities.

    “Most of the data used in corporate globalization studies come from external sources, and these provide only limited information on MNEs' international activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Denis et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Scholars studying born globals and global value chains, most of which are not global by any reasonable standard, have a better command of their data than scholars studying large MNEs, because born global data are often hand-collected and global value chain scholars emphasize understanding their data.

    “The great paradox of corporate globalization research is that the scholars studying born globals and global value chains, most of which are not ''global'' by any reasonable standard, actually have a much better command of their data than the scholars studying large MNEs.The reason is that at least some information on the born globals studied is typically hand-collected, whereas the scholars”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Instead of building from firm-level data upward, researchers usually define regional units from macro-level data; arbitrary aggregation decisions then undermine comparability and reproducibility.

    “The above suggests that researchers typically face two methodological challenges: Firstly, rather than starting with understanding and aggregating firm-level data from the bottom-up, and gaining insight into the reasons for actual geographic dispersion, they start from the macro-level to establish regional geographic units.Secondly, they make arbitrary choices in the aggregation process, thereby”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Because Compustat does not specify individual countries in each segment, the number of global segments and the number of countries cannot be used as measures of global diversification.

    “Given these limitations, the number of global segments in which a firm operates has limited meaning and we do not report it as a measure of global diversification.In addition, because the database does not specify the individual countries that are included in each segment, we are unable to use the number of countries as a measure of global diversification”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Denis et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sales data dominate measurement of corporate globalization; asset or employee dispersion appears in only a few published studies.

    “It should also be noted that corporate globalization has been assessed almost exclusively on the basis of sales data.Only few published articles have included other parameters, such as asset or employee dispersion (Rugman & Verbeke, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rugman & Verbeke, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Information from the world's largest companies on their business activities abroad is often missing, presented in idiosyncratic ways, and subject to firm-specific discretionary choices in data gathering and dissemination.

    “What we can infer from these cases, representative of many other firms, is that information from the world's largest companies on their business activities abroad, is often missing.It is presented in idiosyncratic ways, and subject to firm-specific, discretionary choices as to intra-company data gathering and dissemination routines.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four firm examples (Coca-Cola, Volkswagen, Microsoft, Sinopec) are representative of many other large firms in their disclosure of international activities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The described public reporting practices of Coca-Cola, Volkswagen, Microsoft, and Sinopec accurately reflect their disclosure of international activities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without baseline corporate globalization data, IB researchers will struggle to participate meaningfully in public debates about the virtues and sins of internationally operating firms and their societal impacts.

    “Absent such baseline information, IB researchers will find it difficult to participate meaningfully in the public debate on the ''virtues versus sins'' of internationally operating firms, and on these firms' broader societal impacts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although Kim's (1989) methodology was seen as promising, it was rarely adopted because researchers could not get the necessary data.

    “The problem is that best practice methodologies, such as the one proposed by Kim (1989), though having been recognized as very promising, did not develop further and ultimately have experienced little adoption, because researchers were not able to obtain the requisite data to apply the instrument.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim (1989)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A shift by MNEs toward gathering and disclosing better information on their international activities would benefit IB scholars and create a win-win-win situation by supporting more reliable knowledge development and benefiting strategy and public policy.

    “IB scholars would benefit greatly from a shift in policy practices by MNEs in terms of these firms gathering and subsequently disclosing better information on their international activities.Such a shift would equate to a ''win-win-win'' situation: Better information would support more reliable knowledge development on the content, context and consequences of MNE behaviour, which could in turn”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Critics who argue that global firms are a malign presence in host countries and thrive on malevolent decision-making are battling imaginary enemies.

    “Critics who argue that global firms are a malign presence in host countries and thrive on alleged malevolent decision-making processes are, in fact, battling imaginary enemies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The bulk of earlier IB work on corporate globalization seems to have aimed at the wrong target.

    “At present, most past analyses of corporate globalization in IB research, simply appear to have ''missed the target.''”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A debate on regionalization versus globalization materialized and included substantive discussion on appropriate thresholds to assess globalization.

    “A debate along the lines suggested above, did materialize in the realm of regionalization (versus globalization), and included substantive discussion on the choice of appropriate thresholds to assess globalization (see, e.g., Osegowitsch & Sammartino, 2008;Rugman & Verbeke, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Osegowitsch & Sammartino, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rugman & Verbeke, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Geographic segment information is typically requested in annual reporting, but sharing it is not compulsory and disclosure largely depends on each company's approach to data gathering and sharing.

    “At this time, geographic segment information is typically requested, but sharing such information is not really compulsory and disclosure largely depends on each company's approach to data gathering and sharing of information on its international activities (as illustrated by the firm-level examples above; see also, as an illustration, the United States FASB requisite disclosures about ''segments”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites FASB

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the longer run, IB scholars cannot do serious work on corporate globalization unless they gain access to good baseline data on the firms they study and these firms become more than nameless black boxes.

    “In the longer run, IB scholars cannot do serious work on corporate globalization, unless they gain access to good baseline data on the firms they are studying, and these firms become more than nameless black boxes about which little is known beyond some superficial internationalization characteristics and other quantitative information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A new venture's international footprint seldom warrants the global label; exceptions are luxury-goods or high-tech/IT niche firms that require little adaptation.

    “Only in exceptional cases does a new firm's geographic reach actually fit the ''global'' label.Such cases include firms selling luxury goods, or operating in high-tech and IT niche markets, and requiring little adaptation or critical complementary resources at the downstream end.These firms may fit the born global mold (Hennart, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hennart, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compustat reallocates company-reported segments into seven geographic segments and then regroups them into four global segments, so a single segment may represent one country or a large multi-country region.

    “It first re-allocates the segments reported by the companies themselves among seven geographical segments.Compustat then ''regroups'' these regions to obtain four global segments.This process implies that any single segment in the database might represent either one country or a very large geographic region with multiple countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Denis et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Studies on corporate globalization of large MNEs, including analyses of performance impacts of global diversification, are typically the weakest, with scholars lacking in-depth command of their data and knowledge of the firms, management teams, and business models in their samples.

    “The studies on the corporate globalization of large MNEs, inter alia in the realm of analyzing the performance impacts of global diversification, are typically the weakest.Scholars appear to lack an indepth command of their data, in the sense that they do not really know the firms in their samples, nor the management teams leading these firms, nor the business models deployed by these firms, etc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Three key interrelated empirical challenges are crude proxies, aggregation/re-computation, and sample selection.

    “Three key interrelated challenges would appear critical here.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In research on born globals and global value chains, the 'global' label is often used as a teaser, creating a gap between authors' claims and what has actually been observed.

    “For these emerging topics, the ''global'' label often appears to be leveraged as a teaser, so as to make the research look more interesting.But this approach typically creates a large gap between what authors claim, and what has actually been observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Novel resource combinations require intense and challenging processes of melding new resources with extant capabilities.

    “But novel resource combinations entail intense and challenging processes of melding the new resources involved, with extant capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Corporate globalization studies will mostly demonstrate the vulnerability, rather than the ferociousness, of the few global firms, born globals, and truly global value chains currently in existence.

    “These studies will mostly demonstrate the vulnerability, rather than the ferociousness, of the few global firms, the few born globals and the few truly global value chains, presently in existence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Managerial practices for geographic expansion must balance maximizing net efficiency benefits and minimizing negative societal spillovers.

    “It has become abundantly clear that these managerial practices must artfully balance the goals of maximizing net efficiency-benefits and minimizing what could subsequently be construed as being negative, societal spillovers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Such entrepreneurial decisions must be guided by superior entrepreneurial judgment and accompanied by disciplined implementation of firm-specific managerial practices supporting geographic expansion.

    “Such decisions are necessarily guided by superior entrepreneurial judgment, but must also be associated with the disciplined implementation of firmspecific, managerial practices in support of geographic expansion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    National regimes that force foreign companies to share intellectual property in return for market access may be the single most important threat to further corporate and macro-level globalization, and such forced sharing jeopardizes efficiency benefits for society.

    “Here, national regimes thriving on the ''forced sharing'' of intellectual property by foreign companies in return for market access, may well represent the single most important threat to further corporate and macro-level globalization.Such forced sharing of proprietary knowledge also jeopardizes the related efficiency-benefits accruing to society at large.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Successfully melding extant FSA reservoirs of internationally operating firms with complementary resources from multiple host environments requires a sequence of entrepreneurial decisions.

    “Successfully melding the extant FSA reservoirs of internationally operating firms with the complementary resources provided by actors in multiple host environments, requires a sequence of entrepreneurial decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Recent inequality growth in developed economies stems chiefly from technological change, declining union power, and national tax rules rather than from globalization.

    “Moreover, increases in inequality in recent decades in developed countries have largely been the outcome of new technology adoption, the weakened power of organized labour and domestic tax policies, but are not the result of globalization.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Apart from clear cases of market-power abuse, the main adverse spillovers of international business arise from societal institutions that fail to regulate economic activity.

    “Most negative spillovers of IB activities, apart from highly visible cases of market power abuse, have largely been the result of ineffective societal institutions, supposed to regulate economic activities but failing to do so.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four firm examples (Coca-Cola, Volkswagen, Microsoft, Sinopec) are representative of many other large firms in their disclosure of international activities.

    “What we can infer from these cases, representative of many other firms, is that information from the world's largest companies on their business activities abroad, is often missing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many companies already collect baseline information on the distribution of sales and assets for internal coordination and monitoring.

    “Many companies already do collect this baseline information for internal coordination and monitoring purposes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Enhanced disclosures following more stringent international standards have already improved information gathering and dissemination on the dispersion of MNE international activities.

    “Enhanced disclosures following more stringent international standards have already helped to improve information gathering and dissemination on the dispersion of MNE international activities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The described public reporting practices of Coca-Cola, Volkswagen, Microsoft, and Sinopec accurately reflect their disclosure of international activities.

    “Coca-Cola, for example, provides relatively detailed data in its publicly available reporting on the geographic dispersion of its activities, including sales, capital investments, profits, etc.Similarly, Volkswagen also provides data on the dispersion of its sales and assets (including intangible assets) across regions.But when moving to Microsoft, the only distinction provided is between domestic”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very few truly global value chains are currently in existence, and the label global may misrepresent the actual geographic reach of MNEs' international networks.

    “It has been argued that very few truly global value chains are currently in existence, and that the label ''global,'' used either out of inertia or as a teaser, may in fact misrepresent the actual geographic reach of MNEs' international networks (Verbeke, Coeurderoy, & Matt, 2018).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Verbeke, Coeurderoy, & Matt, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Two different 50% thresholds define a global firm

    Minor

    The first definition limits sales in the home region only; the later definition limits sales in every triad region. A firm with 25% of sales at home, 55% in one host region, and 20% in the other meets the first definition but not the second.

  • Entropy index is interpreted in the opposite direction

    Minor

    The stated formula gives a domestically concentrated firm an index of zero: its sole sales share is 1, and ln(1/1) is zero. Dispersion across regions raises the index, contrary to the paper's interpretation of values near zero and one.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Backman, C. A., Verbeke, A., & Schulz, R. A. 2017. The drivers of corporate climate change strategies and public policy: A new resource-based view perspective. Business and Society, 56(4): 545–575. · DOI
  2. Berry, H. 2017. Managing valuable knowledge in weak IP protection countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(7): 787–807. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beugelsdijk, S., Ambos, B., & Nell, P. C. 2018. Conceptualizing and measuring distance in international business research: Recurring questions and best practice guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0182-4 . · DOI
  4. Brandl, K., Darendeli, I., & Mudambi, R. 2018. Foreign actors and intellectual property protection regulations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0172-6 . · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chang, S., Kogut, B., & Yang, J. S. 2016. Global diversification discount and its discontents: A bit of self-selection makes a world of difference. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11): 2254–2274. · DOI
  6. Chung, C. C., Lee, S. H., Beamish, P. W., & Isobe, T. 2010. Subsidiary expansion/contraction during times of economic crisis. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 500–516. · DOI
  7. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. 2002. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 57(5): 1951–1979. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dunning, J. 2006; original version 1958. American investment in British manufacturing industry. New York: Routledge. · DOI
  9. Ellis, J. A., Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. 2017. Portable country governance and cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2): 148–173. · DOI
  10. Errunza, V. R., & Senbet, L. W. 1984. International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size–adjusted evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39(3): 727–743.
  11. Forsgren, M. 2017. Theories of the multinational firm: A multidimensional creature in the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  12. Friedman, T. L. 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. London: Macmillan.
  13. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78–104. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 425–440. · DOI
  15. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1985. Do you really have a global strategy? Harvard Business Review, 63(4): 139–148.
  16. Hashai, N. 2011. Sequencing the expansion of geographic scope and foreign operations by “born global” firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(8): 995–1015. · DOI
  17. Hennart, J. F. 2014. The accidental internationalists: A theory of born globals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1): 117–135. · DOI
  18. Hillemann, J., Verbeke, A., & Oh, W. 2018. Regional integration, multinational enterprise strategy and country-level risk: The case of the EMU. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12326 . · DOI
  19. Hitt, M. A., Li, D., & Xu, K. 2016. International strategy: From local to global and beyond. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 58–73. · DOI
  20. Hopkins, A. G. (Ed.). 2002. Globalization in world history. New York: W. W. Norton.
  21. Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. 1979. Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4): 359–369. · DOI
  22. Jones, G. 2005. Multinationals and global capitalism: From the nineteenth to the twenty first century. New York: Oxford University Press.
  23. Kano, L. 2018. Global value chain governance: A relational perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6): 684–705. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kano, L. & Verbeke A. 2019. Theories of the multinational firm: A microfoundational perspective. Global Strategy Journal (forthcoming). · DOI
  25. Kim, W. C. 1989. Developing a global diversification measure. Management Science, 35(3): 376–383. · DOI
  26. Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. 1993. Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14(4): 275–286. · DOI
  27. Kim, J. B., Pevzner, M., & Xin, X. 2018. Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0160-x . · DOI
  28. Kogut, B. 1985. Designing global strategies: Comparative and competitive value-added chains. Sloan Management Review, 26(4): 15.
  29. Koning, M., Mertens, G., & Roosenboom, P. 2018. Drivers of institutional change around the world: The case of IFRS. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3): 249–271. · DOI
  30. Levitt, T. 1983. The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61, 92–102.
  31. Lopez, L. E., Kundu, S. K., & Ciravegna, L. 2009. Born global or born regional? Evidence from an exploratory study in the Costa Rican software industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7): 1228–1238. · DOI · Paper page
  32. McGahan, A. M., & Victer, R. 2010. How much does home country matter to corporate profitability? Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1): 142–165. · DOI
  33. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2): 165–187. · DOI
  34. Mudambi, R., & Puck, J. 2016. A global value chain analysis of the ‘regional strategy’ perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6): 1076–1093. · DOI
  35. Narula, R., & Verbeke, A. 2015. Making internalization theory good for practice: The essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 612–622. · DOI · Paper page
  36. O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. 2002. When did globalisation begin? European Review of Economic History, 6(1): 23–50. · DOI
  37. Oh, C. H., & Rugman, A. M. 2014. The dynamics of regional and global multinationals, 1999–2008. Multinational Business Review, 22(2): 108–117. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ohmae, K. 1985. Triad power: The coming shape of global competition. New York: The Free Press.
  39. Ohmae, K. 1995. The end of the nation state: The rise of regional economies. New York: The Free Press.
  40. Osegowitsch, T., & Sammartino, A. 2008. Reassessing (home-) regionalisation. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2): 184–196. · DOI
  41. Powell, K. S. 2014. From M-P to MA–P: Multinationality alignment and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2): 211–226. · DOI
  42. Qian, G., Li, L., & Rugman, A. M. 2013. Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6): 635–647. · DOI
  43. Rugman, A. M., Oh, C. H., & Lim, D. S. 2012. The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2): 218–235. · DOI
  44. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237–250. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 3–18. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2008. A new perspective on the regional and global strategies of multinational services firms. Management International Review, 48(4): 397–411. · DOI
  47. Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
  48. Verbeke, A. 2013. International business strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Verbeke, A., & Asmussen, C. G. 2016. Global, local, or regional? The locus of MNE strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6): 1051–1075. · DOI
  50. Verbeke, A., & Ciravegna, L. 2018. International entrepreneurship research versus international business research: A false dichotomy? Journal of International Business Studies, 49(4): 387–394. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Verbeke, A., & Forootan, M. Z. 2012. How good are multinationality–performance (M–P) empirical studies? Global Strategy Journal, 2(4): 332–344. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2016. An internalization theory perspective on the global and regional strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 83–92. · DOI
  53. Verbeke, A., Puck, J., & van Tulder, R. (Eds.). 2017b. Distance in international business: Concept, cost and value. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  54. Wan, W. P., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2003. Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1): 27–45. · DOI
  55. Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. 2008. Corporate diversification: The impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2): 115–132. · DOI
  56. WTO. 2017. World trade statistical review 2017. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  57. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 925–950. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verbeke, A., Coeurderoy, R., & Matt, T.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Verbeke, Alain
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2018-11-04
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
1101-1112
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2898836473
Cited by
149
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14
FWCI
20.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • George Washington University
  • University of International Business and Economics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Globalization, Economics, and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
globalization, international business research agenda, foreign direct investment, international trade, globalization measurement, history of globalization, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review