Cited by 53Intellectual Property and PatentsInternational Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge Management

Patent protection and the composition of multinational activity: Evidence from US multinational firms

Ivus, Olena, Park, Walter G, Saggi, Kamal·2017·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41267-017-0100-1

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent to which firms can engage in mirroring depends on several factors, which include the host-country's IPR protections, their own internalization effects, and the complexity of technical knowledge when making mirroring decisions.

    “The extent to which firms can engage in mirroring depends on several factors, which include the host-country's IPR protections, their own internalization effects, and the complexity of technical knowledge when making mirroring decisions”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivus, O., Park, W. G., & Saggi, K.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • American University (US)
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2017-09
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
808-836
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W566647690
Cited by
53
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
patent protection, technology licensing, technology transfer, multinational corporations, appropriability, internalization theory, technological complexity, patent policy, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review