Cited by 34Supply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsSupply Chain and Inventory Management

A perfect storm or an imperfect supply chain? The U.S. supply chain crisis

Open access
Kent, Paul, Haralambides, Hercules·2022·Maritime Economics & Logistics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41278-022-00221-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lateral impact of this trend would be the revival of WCNA port throughputs, which have been losing out consistently to ECNA ports in recent years.

    “A lateral impact of this trend would be the revival of WCNA port throughputs, which have been losing out consistently to ECNA ports in recent years (Kent and Haralambides, 2022; US Department of Transportation 2023).”

    From The Red Sea Crisis: ramifications for vessel operations, shipping networks, and maritime supply chains (2024) · cites this paper as Kent and Haralambides, 2022

    Section 5, “Will shifting supply chains solve the problem?” (page unavailable), predicts greater utilization of Gulf and East Coast ports as supply chains shift—not a revival of West Coast throughput. Section 6, “Recommendations” (page unavailable), says Los Angeles/Long Beach may need to decline additional throughput once congestion-risk thresholds are reached. The copy does not establish the claimed consistent historical loss to East Coast ports. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kent, P., & Haralambides, H.
Affiliations
Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne (FR)
Corresponding author
Kent, Paul
Venue
Maritime Economics & Logistics
Published
2022-02-16
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 1479-2931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-294X
OpenAlex
W4213171746
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maritime Economics & Logistics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Keywords
supply chain crisis, COVID-19 pandemic, e-commerce development, household expenditure, port congestion, freight rates, inflation, supply chain bottlenecks, excess demand, global supply chain disruption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review