Cited by 12Eating Disorders and BehaviorsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Anorexia’s failed little sisters: reflections on researching bulimia as a former bulimic

Frey, Isabel·2020·Social Theory & Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41285-019-00100-5

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Frey, I.
Affiliations
University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Frey, Isabel
Venue
Social Theory & Health
Published
2019-02-28
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
138-151
ISSN
  • 1477-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-822X
OpenAlex
W2919604617
Cited by
12
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Theory & Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, anorexia, reflexivity, embodied reflexivity, autobiographical research, eating disorders, stigma, researcher experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review