Cited by 161Misinformation and Its ImpactsHumor Studies and ApplicationsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Cognitive attraction and online misinformation

Open access
Acerbi, Alberto·2019·Palgrave Communications

Abstract

The spread of online misinformation has gained mainstream attention in recent years. This paper approaches this phenomenon from a cultural evolution and cognitive anthropology perspective, focusing on the idea that some cultural traits can be successful because their content taps into general cognitive preferences. This research involves 260 articles from media outlets included in two authoritative lists of websites known for publishing hoaxes and ‘fake news’, tracking the presence of negative content, threat-related information, presence of sexually related material, elements associated to disgust, minimally counterintuitive elements (and a particular category of them, i.e., violations of essentialist beliefs), and social information, intended as presence of salient social interactions (e.g., gossip, cheating, formation of alliances), and as news about celebrities. The analysis shows that these features are, to a different degree, present in most texts, and thus that general cognitive inclinations may contribute to explain the success of online misinformation. This account can elucidate questions such as whether and why misinformation online is thriving more than accurate information, or the role of ‘fake news’ as a weapon of political propaganda. Online misinformation, while being an umbrella term covering many different phenomena, can be characterised, in this perspective, not as low-quality information that spreads because of the inefficiency of online communication, but as high-quality information that spreads because of its efficiency. The difference is that ‘quality’ is not equated to truthfulness but to psychological appeal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41599-019-0224-y

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithmic amplification of emotionally and morally charged content may feed back into human social learning-for instance, inflating beliefs about the normative value of expressing moral outrage, increasing outgroup animosity or creating echo chambers and filter bubbles.

    “The algorithmic amplification of such content may then feed back into human social learning-for instance, inflating beliefs about the normative value of expressing moral outrage 138,139 , increasing outgroup animosity 140 or creating echo chambers and filter bubbles [141][142][143] .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [138]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Clasen M (2007) Why horror seduces. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  2. Facebook (2018) Facebook reports first quarter 2018 results. https://investor.fb. com/investor-news/press-release-details/2018/Facebook-Reports-First- Quarter-2018-Results/default.aspx. Accessed 17 Dec 2018
  3. Morin O (2016) How traditions live and die. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acerbi, A.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Acerbi, Alberto
Venue
Palgrave Communications
Published
2019-02-12
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896295631
Cited by
161
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14
FWCI
39.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.144312, VIDI Grant 016.144312)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
online misinformation, fake news, hoaxes, cultural evolution, cognitive anthropology, disgust, essentialist beliefs, social information, gossip, political propaganda, media content analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review