Countering dis/misinformation sharing by hindering moral disengagement in adolescence: the role of prosocial conversational modeling
Open accessAbstract
The spread of dis/misinformation represents a pressing challenge for contemporary society. Addressing this phenomenon requires digital tools as well as an understanding of the mechanisms that enable it. Among the psychosocial mechanisms, the detrimental role of moral disengagement is becoming increasingly evident. Through these mechanisms, people can justify the creation and sharing of misleading news by minimizing its effects and normalizing such behaviors in online social interactions. Moreover, this issue is particularly relevant for adolescents, who are not yet fully equipped to navigate the traps and risks of the digital world. The present study aims to explore how prosocial conversational agents designed for helping adolescents in dealing with dis/misinformation in online social settings can reduce reliance on moral disengagement and the intention of sharing misleading news. Specifically, a prosocial conversational agent was designed to enhance adolescents’ awareness of online risks and to support them in applying prosocial communication strategies - that is, in conveying what they had learned to help others avoid falling into online traps. In a sample of 391 adolescents (53.2% girls) with a mean age of 13.27 years (SD = 0.69), we analyzed the pattern of associations linked to conversational interaction with the prosocial agent, while controlling for adolescents’ initial differences, as well as differences in the quality of their interaction with the agent. Results from a path analysis model show that perceiving conversational agents as an agentic model was positively associated with prosocial communicative responses aimed at helping another party. In turn, prosocial communicative responses were associated with reduced reliance on moral disengagement and lower misleading news sharing intention. Overall, the findings suggest that the use of prosocial conversational agents may represent a promising direction for future research in counteracting moral disengagement and combating dis/misinformation by fostering awareness and prosocial communicative strategies during adolescence, a critical phase in which technologies can become a valuable tool for engaging with digital-native generations.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A two-session conversational web-app with a prosocial peer agent (“Sofia”) was tested in 391 Italian adolescents to see whether prosocial conversational modeling reduces moral disengagement and intention to share misleading news. Path analysis found perceived agent efficacy was linked to prosocial communicative responses, which in turn were associated with lower moral disengagement and lower misleading-news sharing intention.
Key findings
- Perceived agency of the prosocial model was positively associated with prosocial communicative response (β = .18, SE = .06, p = .002, 95% CI [.06, .29]).
- Prosocial communicative response was negatively associated with moral disengagement toward fake news (β = -.18, SE = .05, p < .001, 95% CI [-.27, -.08]) and with misleading news sharing intention (β = -.13, SE = .06, p = .036, 95% CI [-.25, -.01]).
- Moral disengagement toward fake news positively predicted misleading news sharing intention (β = .20, SE = .07, p = .006, 95% CI [.06, .35]).
- The model explained 25% of variance in misleading news sharing intention, 30% in moral disengagement toward fake news, and 14% in prosocial communicative response; fit was good (χ² = 12.89, df = 11, p = .301; CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA = .02, 90% CI [0.000, 0.074]; SRMR = .02).
Methods
- A custom conversational web-app was developed with a virtual peer agent, Sofia, who modeled strategies for recognizing and resisting misleading news; in a second phase, adolescents were asked to help another avatar, aunt Susanna, by reproducing what they learned.
- Participants were 391 adolescents (53.2% girls) with a mean age of 13.27 years (SD = 0.69), recruited as a convenience sample from three schools in southern Italy; they completed two computer-based sessions of about 60 minutes each, scheduled one or two weeks apart.
- The study used path analysis in R with maximum likelihood estimation and 95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals from 5,000 resamples, controlling for gender, age, social desirability, baseline moral disengagement and sharing intention, interest in dis/misinformation risks, perceived conversation quality, and overall interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that it relies on self-reported and conversational measures, including stated intention to share misleading news rather than observed sharing behavior, so intentions may not proxy actual behavior.
- The paper states that paths and indirect effects should be interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects, even with baseline and covariate adjustment.
- The paper states the sample came from a specific geographical region and calls for replication in diverse contexts with larger, longitudinal designs; the text also makes evident that prosocial communicative response had low internal consistency (α = .48, ω = .49) and that there was no randomized control group, further limiting causal inference.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 63 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductcitation
The four prosocial communicative response items were not assumed to measure a single underlying construct but were treated as indicators of performance across multiple domains.
“The four items represent distinct communicative challenges, each involving different types of manipulations and requiring context-specific reasoning; as such, they were not assumed to measure a single underlying construct, but were treated as indicators of performance across multiple domains (Tavakol & Dennick, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tavakol & Dennick, 2011 source
The “Use of Cronbach’s alpha” section supports treating items that measure different constructs separately rather than assuming a single underlying construct. It does not examine the four prosocial communicative response items or establish that they represent distinct challenges or measure performance across multiple domains. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Participants identifying as female showed significantly lower levels of moral disengagement compared to males (beta = -.28, SE = .05, p < .001, 95% CI [-.37, -.19]).
“participants identifying as female showed significantly lower levels of moral disengagement compared to males (β = -.28,SE = .05,p < .001,95% CI [-.37, -.19])”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The perceived quality of the conversation did not show any significant relationships with the outcome variables.
“The perceived quality of the conversation did not show any significant relationships with the outcome variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Moral disengagement toward fake news was positively associated with intention to share misleading news.
“Moral disengagement was also positively associated with the intention to share misleading news.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Male participants were more inclined to share misleading news after the interaction than female participants.
“were more inclined to share misleading news after the interaction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was positively associated with news sharing intention measured after the interaction.
“Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was positively associated with both moral disengagement and news sharing intention measured after the interaction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Perceived agency of the prosocial model was negatively correlated with moral disengagement toward fake news.
“perceived agency of the prosocial model showed a negative correlation with moral disengagement toward fake news”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher prosocial communicative response was negatively associated with misleading news sharing intention (beta = -.13, SE = .06, p = .036, 95% CI [-.25, -.01]).
“higher prosocial communicative response was also negatively associated with misleading news sharing intention (β = -.13,SE = .06,p = .036,95% CI [-.25, -.01]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interest in specific dis/misinformation risks was negatively associated with moral disengagement measured after the interaction.
“and negatively associated with moral disengagement measured after the interaction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Male participants scored higher on moral disengagement than female participants.
“male participants scored higher on moral disengagement”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Higher levels of perceived agency of the prosocial model were positively associated with prosocial communicative response (beta = .18, SE = .06, p = .002, 95% CI [.06, .29]).
“higher levels of perceived agency of the prosocial model were positively associated with prosocial communicative response (β = .18,SE = .06,p = .002,95% CI [.06, .29]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was positively associated with moral disengagement measured after the interaction.
“Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was positively associated with both moral disengagement and news sharing intention measured after the interaction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adolescents who reported greater interest in dis/misinformation risks were more likely to engage in successful prosocial communicative response (beta = .19, SE = .07, p = .003, 95% CI [.06, .32]).
“adolescents who reported greater interest in dis/misinformation risks were more likely to engage in successful prosocial communicative response (β = .19,SE = .07,p = .003,95% CI [.06, .32])”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prosocial communicative response was negatively correlated with intention to share misleading news measured after the interaction.
“prosocial communicative response, in turn, was negatively correlated with both moral disengagement toward fake news and the intention to share misleading news, measured after the interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants identifying as female showed higher levels of prosocial communicative response (beta = .11, SE = .05, p = .043, 95% CI [.01, .22]).
“and higher levels of prosocial communicative response (β = .11,SE = .05,p = .043,95% CI [.01, .22]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was consistently linked with disengagement measured after the conversation (beta = .31, SE = .05, p < .001, 95% CI [.22, .41]).
“Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was consistently linked with disengagement measured after the conversation (β = .31,SE = .05,p < .001,95% CI [.22, .41])”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Perceived agency of the prosocial model was not significantly related to misleading news sharing intention.
“but was not significantly related to misleading news sharing intention”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Moral disengagement assessed before the interaction was negatively associated with prosocial communicative response.
“and negatively associated with prosocial communicative response”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Perceived agency of the prosocial model was positively correlated with prosocial communicative response.
“the perceived agency of the prosocial model was positively correlated with prosocial communicative response”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Moral disengagement was a significant positive predictor of intention to share biased news (beta = .20, SE = .07, p = .006, 95% CI [.06, .35]).
“moral disengagement was a significant positive predictor of intention to share biased news (β = .20,SE = .07,p = .006,95% CI [.06, .35]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adolescents who reported greater interest in dis/misinformation risks showed lower levels of moral disengagement toward fake news (beta = -.12, SE = .05, p = .028, 95% CI [-.22, -.01]).
“and showed lower levels of moral disengagement toward fake news (β = -.12,SE = .05,p = .028,95% CI [-.22, -.01]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants' general tendency to share misleading news measured at the beginning of the web-app was consistently associated with higher sharing intention after the interaction (beta = .16, SE = .06, p = .013, 95% CI [.03, .28]).
“Participants' general tendency to share misleading news measured at the beginning of the web-app was consistently associated with higher sharing intention after the interaction (β = .16,SE = .06,p = .013,95% CI [.03, .28]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prosocial communicative response was negatively correlated with moral disengagement toward fake news measured after the interaction.
“prosocial communicative response, in turn, was negatively correlated with both moral disengagement toward fake news and the intention to share misleading news, measured after the interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prosocial communicative response was significantly associated with lower levels of moral disengagement toward fake news (beta = -.18, SE = .05, p < .001, 95% CI [-.27, -.08]).
“prosocial communicative response was significantly associated with lower levels of moral disengagement toward fake news (H2a; β = -.18,SE = .05,p < .001,95% CI [-.27, -.08]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model showed good fit to the data: chi-square = 12.89, df = 11, p = 0.301; CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA = 0.02, 90% CI [0.000, 0.074], p = 0.761; SRMR = 0.02.
“The results indicated a good fit to the data, thus confirming the plausibility of the hypothesized relationships between the variables: χ 2 = 12.89, df = 11, p = 0.301; CFI = .99;TLI = .99;RMSEA = 0.02, 90% CI [0.000, 0.074], p = 0.761; SRMR = 0.02.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall interest in the topics discussed during the interaction showed a positive association only with sharing intention assessed after the interaction (beta = .29, SE = .08, p < .001, 95% CI [.14, .45]).
“Overall interest in the topics discussed during the interaction showed a positive association only with sharing intention assessed after the interaction (β = .29,SE = .08,p < .001,95% CI [.14, .45]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Interest in specific dis/misinformation risks was positively correlated with prosocial communicative response.
“interest in specific dis/misinformation risks was positively correlated with perceived agency of the model and prosocial communicative response”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall interest in the interaction with the prosocial model showed a significant association only with misleading news sharing intention assessed at the end of the conversation.
“overall interest in the interaction with the prosocial model showed a significant association only with misleading news sharing intention assessed at the end of the conversation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The indirect effect of perceived agency of the prosocial model on misleading news sharing intention through prosocial communicative response was -0.023 (SE = 0.013, 95% CI [-0.049, 0.003]).
“AG → PCR → SI | -0.023 | 0.013 | [-0.049, 0.003]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The indirect effect of perceived agency of the prosocial model on moral disengagement toward fake news through prosocial communicative response was -0.031 (SE = 0.014, 95% CI [-0.060, -0.003]).
“AG → PCR → MD | -0.031 | 0.014 | [-0.060, -0.003]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Moral disengagement mediates the relationship between prosocial communicative response and misleading news sharing intention.
“the role of moral disengagement in mediating the relationship between prosocial communicative response and misleading news sharing intention”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Egoistic self-enhancement was a significant positive predictor of misleading news sharing intention after the interaction (beta = .19, SE = .07, p = .003, 95% CI [.07, .32]).
“egoistic selfenhancement was a significant positive predictor of misleading news sharing intention after the interaction (β = .19,SE = .07,p = .003,95% CI [.07, .32])”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Moralistic self-enhancement did not show any significant association with the outcome variables.
“Moralistic self-enhancement did not show any significant association with the outcome variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The indirect effect of prosocial communicative response on misleading news sharing intention through moral disengagement toward fake news was -0.036 (SE = 0.016, 95% CI [-0.066, -0.005]).
“PCR → MD → SI | -0.036 | 0.016 | [-0.066, -0.005]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Technological features of social media can activate moral disengagement.
“Technological features of social media can activate moral disengagement (Runions & Bak, 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Runions & Bak, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Through self-persuasion, individuals become more committed to aligning their actions with what they have learned, making it more difficult to engage in moral disengagement.
“Through self-persuasion, individuals become more committed to aligning their actions with what they have learned, making it more difficult to engage in moral disengagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Moral disengagement can facilitate the circulation of misleading information by reducing the perceived seriousness of the phenomenon and diminishing individuals' sense of responsibility and awareness of its potential consequences.
“Moral disengagement, by allowing individuals to selectively bypass moral self-regulation, can facilitate the circulation of misleading information by reducing the perceived seriousness of the phenomenon and diminishing individuals' sense of responsibility and awareness of its potential consequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Among the underlying mechanisms promoting dis/misinformation during adolescence, moral disengagement seems to be crucial.
“Among the underlying mechanisms promoting dis/misinformation during adolescence, moral disengagement seems to be crucial (Maftei et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maftei et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Perceived agency of the prosocial agent is functional in promoting helping behaviors in both children and adolescents.
“This perceived agency is functional in promoting helping behaviors in both children and adolescents (Chernyak & Gary, 2019;Oliveira et al., 2021;Srinivasan & Takayama, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chernyak & Gary, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Srinivasan & Takayama, 2016 source
- Premisecitation
Regardless of intentionality, the sharing of misleading or harmful content can be sustained by distorting mechanisms that allow individuals to justify their actions, downplay moral responsibility, and gradually become more tolerant of behavior they would otherwise condemn.
“Regardless of intentionality, the sharing of misleading or even harmful content can be sustained by distorting mechanisms that allow individuals to justify their actions, downplay moral responsibility, and gradually become more tolerant of behavior they would otherwise condemn (Bandura, 1986(Bandura, , 2016)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bandura, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bandura, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The internal consistency of the five interest in specific dis/misinformation risks items was acceptable (alpha = .73; Omega = .80).
“The internal consistency of these items was acceptable, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha (α = .73)and McDonald's Omega (ω = .80).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The act of explaining learned principles to another person reinforces the adolescent's own understanding.
“reinforces his or her own understanding of these principles through the act of explaining them to another person (Orosz et al., 2023)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Orosz et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The internal consistency of the three moral disengagement toward fake news items was satisfactory at T1 (alpha = .71; Omega = .72) and at T2 (alpha = .81; Omega = .82).
“The internal consistency of these items was satisfactory both at T1, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha (α = .71)and McDonald's Omega (ω = .72),and at the end of the conversational module (α = .81;ω = .82).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous evidence indicates a negative association between prosocial behavior and moral disengagement.
“While previous evidence indicates a negative association between prosocial behavior and moral disengagement (Paciello et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paciello et al., 2013 source
- Premisecitation
Moral disengagement mechanisms may be conveniently used to diminish and underestimate the sharing of misleading content and its potential harmful consequences.
“moral disengagement mechanisms may be conveniently used to diminish and underestimate the sharing of misleading content and its potential harmful consequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maftei et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Providing positive examples of behavior that show how to deal with situations without being carried away can help individuals avoid disengaging and instead become active and responsible agents.
“providing positive examples of behavior that show how to deal with situations without being carried away can help individuals avoid disengaging and instead become active and responsible agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A human-agent interaction based on modeling and self-persuasion through a prosocial peer can be helpful in countering these kinds of convenience mechanisms.
“a human-agent interaction based on modeling and self-persuasion through a prosocial peer can be helpful in countering these kinds of convenience mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Counteracting moral disengagement may represent a viable means of hindering the sharing of dis/misinformation.
“Counteracting it may thus represent a viable means of hindering the sharing of dis/misinformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study provides support for the role of prosocial technologies in countering moral disengagement and misleading news sharing in adolescents.
“The current study provides support for the role of prosocial technologies in countering moral disengagement and misleading news sharing in adolescents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Prosocial conversational agents function as prosocial models when perceived as agentic and efficacious.
“the prosocial conversational agents actually appeared to function as prosocial models when perceived as agentic and efficacious.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Moral disengagement has a social nature.
“the literature underscoring its social nature (Gini et al., 2015;Fida et al., 2025)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gini et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fida et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Moral disengagement is a malleable process.
“moral disengagement is a malleable process (Moore, 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
A conversational approach can facilitate attentional and motivational processes that are central to vicarious learning.
“such an approach can facilitate attentional and motivational processes that are central to vicarious learning (Bandura, 1986).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bandura, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Moral disengagement in relation to misleading news has been examined in only a few studies.
“moral disengagement in relation to misleading news has been examined in only a few studies (Authors, in press)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Authors, in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
By interacting with a virtual prosocial conversational agent designed to enable adolescents to recognise the pitfalls of social media, adolescents can vicariously learn alternative prosocial communicative response that, in turn, discourage moral disengagement processes towards fake news and the sharing of dis/misinformation.
“by interacting with a virtual prosocial conversational agent designed to enable adolescents to recognise the pitfalls of social media that facilitate the spread of such news, adolescents can vicariously learn alternative prosocial communicative response that, in turn, discourage moral disengagement processes towards fake news and the sharing of dis/misinformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Specific types of digital technologies, when designed appropriately and theoretically grounded, and particularly conversational agents, can play a significant role in assisting individuals in resolving issues and ambiguities related to information management on social networks.
“The findings suggest that specific types of digital technologies, when designed in an appropriate manner (Oliveira et al., 2021;Veletsianos & Russell, 2014) and theoretically grounded (Greitemeyer, 2022), and particularly conversational agents can play a significant role in assisting individuals in resolving issues and ambiguities related to information management on social networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Veletsianos & Russell, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Greitemeyer, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Conversational agents can educate users on how to employ functional communicative strategies to mitigate the risks associated with dis/misinformative digital media.
“In this way, they can educate users on how to employ functional communicative strategies to mitigate the risks associated with dis/misinformative digital media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The study relies on self-reported and conversational measures, including adolescents' stated intention to share misleading news rather than directly observed sharing behavior.
“the study relies on self-reported and conversational measures, including adolescents' stated intention to share misleading news rather than directly observed sharing behavior”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Conversational agents can facilitate learning how to behave in a prosocial and constructive manner, acting as peer models.
“Furthermore, they can facilitate learning how to behave in a prosocial and constructive manner, acting as peer models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Within the literature on dis/misinformation prevention, prosocial strategies have primarily targeted cognitive aspects.
“within the literature on dis/misinformation prevention, prosocial strategies have primarily targeted cognitive aspects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Orosz et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Present findings suggest that avatar-mediated communication can represent a valuable tool for managing sensitive content.
“Overall, in line with recent literature (Li et al., 2022(Li et al., , 2025)), present findings suggest that avatar-mediated communication can represent a valuable tool for managing sensitive content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Li et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
When a prosocial virtual peer encourages adolescents to behave in a way that aligns with what is considered important, it becomes more difficult for them to resort to moral disengagement mechanisms.
“when a prosocial virtual peer encourages them to behave in a way that aligns with what is considered important, it becomes more difficult for them to resort to moral disengagement mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Variance inflation factors for all predictors across structural equations ranged from 1.01 to 1.26, indicating that multicollinearity was not a concern in the estimated model.
“Variance inflation factors for all predictors across structural equations ranged from 1.01 to 1.26, indicating that multicollinearity was not a concern in the estimated model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Prosocial communicative responses, indicative of the efficacy of the modeling process, enable adolescents to practice what they have learned by transferring their knowledge.
“These prosocial communicative responses, indicative of the efficacy of the modeling process, enable adolescents to practice what they have learned by transferring their knowledge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 58
- May combine two claims. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe video game Bad News was specifically designed to simulate the creation of fake news through strategies including bias, discrediting, and emotionally charged language.
“This game was specifically designed to simulate the creation of fake news through the use of several commonly employed strategies, including the introduction of bias, discrediting, and the use of emotionally charged language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Roozenbeek & Van Der Linden, 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMardia's test indicated a significant departure from normality for multivariate skewness (404.54, p < .001), but not for kurtosis (0.33, p = .740).
“Mardia's test of multivariate normality indicated a significant departure from normality for multivariate skewness (404.54,p < .001),but not for kurtosis (0.33, p = .740).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataInterest in specific dis/misinformation risks was positively correlated with perceived agency of the model.
“interest in specific dis/misinformation risks was positively correlated with perceived agency of the model”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAge did not show significant correlations with any of the model variables.
“Age did not show significant correlations with any of the model variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataQuality of conversation was positively correlated only with news sharing intention measured after the interaction.
“Quality of conversation was positively correlated only with news sharing intention measured after the interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMale participants reported lower levels of prosocial communicative response than female participants.
“while also reporting lower levels of prosocial communicative response”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the same sample, prosocial communicative responses were associated with reduced reliance on moral disengagement and lower misleading news sharing intention.
“In turn, prosocial communicative responses were associated with reduced reliance on moral disengagement and lower misleading news sharing intention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn a sample of 391 adolescents (53.2% girls; mean age 13.27 years, SD = 0.69), perceiving conversational agents as an agentic model was positively associated with prosocial communicative responses aimed at helping another party.
“Results from a path analysis model show that perceiving conversational agents as an agentic model was positively associated with prosocial communicative responses aimed at helping another party.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe overall model explained 25% of the total variance in the intention to share misleading news, 30% of the variance in moral disengagement toward fake news, and 14% of the variance in prosocial communicative response.
“The overall model explained 25% of the total variance in the intention to share misleading news, 30% of the variance in moral disengagement toward fake news, and 14% of the variance in prosocial communicative response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross all item-level specifications, the structural paths of theoretical interest were directionally consistent with the main model, with no reversals in sign or emergence of unexpected effects.
“Across all item-level specifications, the structural paths of theoretical interest were directionally consistent with the main model, with no reversals in sign or emergence of unexpected effects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTechnology has the capacity to elicit positive emotions alongside prosocial behaviors.
“These elements can facilitate positive activation and interest during the mediated interaction, as technology has the capacity to elicit positive emotions alongside prosocial behaviors (Carlo et al., 2005;Greitemeyer, 2009;Niesta Kayser et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Carlo et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Greitemeyer, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Niesta Kayser et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe web-app procedure was administered only if appropriate signed informed consent was obtained from the students' legal guardians.
“the procedure via web-app was administered only if appropriate signed informed consent was obtained from the students' legal guardians”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese studies demonstrate the significant influence of design and the interaction between individual and contextual factors.
“These studies demonstrate the significant influence of design and the interaction between individual and contextual factors (Carlo et al., 2005;Oliveira et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Carlo et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNo research has examined the potential role of conversational agents to serve as prosocial models for encouraging adolescents to mitigate the spread of dis/misinformation.
“Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no research has examined the potential role of conversational agents to serve as prosocial models for encouraging adolescents to mitigate the spread of dis/misinformation, ultimately contributing to the safeguarding of the community from the temptation of moral disengagement and the risks associated with the sharing of such misleading news.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe internal consistency of the four prosocial communicative response items was low (Cronbach's alpha = .48; McDonald's Omega = .49).
“The internal consistency of these items was determined using Cronbach's alpha (α = .48)and McDonald's Omega (ω = .49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAffordances and psycho-technological mechanisms such as confirmation bias, social conformism, filter bubbles, and echo chambers have been recognised as potential risk factors that could trigger moral disengagement processes, promoting online credulity and facilitating misleading news sharing behavior.
“the affordances and thus known psycho-technological mechanisms of almost automatic adherence to popular or familiar content, as in the case of confirmation bias and social conformism (Cinelli et al., 2021;Del Vicario et al., 2017), filter bubble (Parisier, 2011) and echo chambers (Bright, 2016), have been recognised as potential risk factors that could trigger moral disengagement processes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Runions & Bak, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wang & Ngai, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Cinelli et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior work shows that virtual agents mitigate social-desirability bias by reducing perceived judgement from human evaluators.
“Prior work further shows that virtual agents mitigate such bias by reducing perceived judgement from human evaluators (Schuetzler et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schuetzler et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe response options for the prosocial communicative response items were shown in random order.
“The responses were shown in random order”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe link to moral disengagement is evidenced by observations in other contexts in which self-serving mechanisms enable an individual to perceive omission of help, silence in the face of inefficiencies, harm or unethical practices, lack of information verification, and cyberloafing as appropriate or acceptable behaviours.
“The link to moral disengagement is evidenced by observations made in other contexts in which these self-serving mechanisms enable an individual to perceive omission of help (Paciello et al., 2013), silent in face inefficiencies, harm or unethical practices (Fida et al. 2025)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Paciello et al., 2013 source
- cites Fida et al. 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe two misleading news sharing intention ratings were moderately correlated (r = .47, p < .001), indicating some story-specific variability.
“The two sharing intention ratings, one for each news story, were moderately correlated (r = .47,p < .001),indicating some story-specific variability in responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSharing misleading news may take the form of relatively passive harmful conduct, sustained by moral disengagement processes that bypass the cognitive and moral regulation required for responsible actions such as verifying information accuracy before sharing.
“Rather, it may take the form of a relatively passive harmful conduct, sustained by moral disengagement processes that bypass the cognitive and moral regulation required for engaging in responsible actions, such as verifying information accuracy before sharing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Sharing misleading news is not invariably the result of a deliberate intention to cause harm.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe presence of a credible and fluid conversation is a crucial element, as is the agent's perceived autonomy.
“Additionally, the presence of a credible and fluid conversation is a crucial element, as is the agent's perceived autonomy (Paiva et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paiva et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDis/misinformation research about intervention has traditionally prioritized cognitive and evaluative variables, neglecting the potential role of moral disengagement.
“this study addresses a significant gap in dis/misinformation research about intervention, which has traditionally prioritized cognitive and evaluative variables, neglecting the potential role of moral disengagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe completion of shared playful tasks has been demonstrated to facilitate prosocial behaviors following interaction with conversational prosocial agents.
“the completion of shared playful tasks (Avelino et al., 2018) has been demonstrated to facilitate prosocial behaviors following the interaction with conversational prosocial agents, as observed in the study using Lego pieces (Connolly et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Avelino et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Connolly et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe moralistic self-enhancement subscale had acceptable internal consistency (alpha = .65; Omega = .66).
“acceptable for moralistic self-enhancement (α = .65;ω = .66)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo participants declined to participate or withdrew from the study.
“No participants declined to participate or withdrew from the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA substantial body of research in media psychology has examined the ways in which different types of media can influence the formation and expression of prosocial intentions and behaviors among users.
“a substantial body of research in the field of media psychology has examined the ways in which different types of media can influence the formation and expression of prosocial intentions and behaviors among users (for a review see : Greitemeyer, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greitemeyer, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe efficacy of prosocial conversational agents in promoting prosocial intentions or behaviors is contingent upon factors that can influence the quality of user-avatar interaction, including the characteristics of the agent, its physical appearance, and its ability to establish an interesting or emotional connection.
“The efficacy of these agents in promoting prosocial intentions or behaviors is contingent upon a number of factors that can influence the quality of user-avatar interaction, including the characteristics of the prosocial agent, its physical appearance, and its ability to establish an interesting or emotional connection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationRobust fit indices were reported to account for distributional departures.
“Robust fit indices (Satorra & Bentler, 2001) were reported to account for distributional departures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Satorra & Bentler, 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThe proliferation of dis/misinformation appears to be associated with a tendency to avoid verification of its veracity and accuracy.
“the proliferation of dis/misinformation appears to be associated with a tendency to avoid verification of its veracity and accuracy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe platform's step-by-step interactive design allowed participants to progress through the conversation autonomously, making the guided conversation exposure as comparable as possible while minimising peer influence.
“The platform's step-by-step interactive design allowed participants to progress through the conversation autonomously, to make the guided conversation exposure as comparable as possible while minimising peer influence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationA composite score was computed as the mean of the four prosocial communicative response items to reflect overall task performance.
“A composite score was computed as the mean of the four items to reflect overall task performance (Diamantopoulos & Winklhofer, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Diamantopoulos & Winklhofer, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA recent review indicated that, with respect to agents, both virtual and robotic, positive outcomes have been observed.
“A recent review (Oliveira et al., 2021) indicated that, with respect to agents, both virtual and robotic, positive outcomes have been observed (Peter et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Peter et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe review emphasized that, alongside the heterogeneity of the measures employed, there is a need to test the applicative nature of the effect of conversational prosocial agents.
“However, it also emphasized that, alongside the heterogeneity of the measures employed, there is a need to test the applicative nature of the effect of conversational prosocial agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe two misleading news sharing intention ratings were averaged to create an overall sharing intention score.
“Consequently, the two ratings were averaged to create an overall sharing intention score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe web-app's chat format lowers self-presentation concerns commonly associated with questionnaire administration and thus attenuates social-desirability bias.
“This format lowers self-presentation concerns commonly associated with questionnaire administration and thus attenuates social-desirability bias (Achterkamp et al., 2016;Pollini et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Achterkamp et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pollini et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study design and procedures received approval from the ethics committee of the university with which three of the authors are affiliated (reference code ET-24-14).
“The study design and procedures received approval from the ethics committee of the university with which three of the authors are affiliated (reference code ET-24-14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExposure to prosocial video games can facilitate the accessibility of prosocial thoughts, thereby promoting prosocial behavior.
“Greitemeyer and Osswald (2010) demonstrate that exposure to prosocial video games can facilitate the accessibility of prosocial thoughts, thereby promoting prosocial behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greitemeyer and Osswald (2010)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll data analysis code and the fully executed knitted output are publicly available on the Open Science Framework (OSF).
“All data analysis code, along with the fully executed knitted output, are publicly available on the Open Science Framework (OSF)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEngaging in conversation with a virtual agent coupled with the possibility of performing a task together may serve as an additional factor in promoting prosocial behaviors.
“the review conducted by Oliveira and colleagues (2021) suggests that engaging in conversation with a virtual agent coupled with the possibility of performing a task together may serve as an additional factor in promoting prosocial behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe impact of prosocial modeling on a young user's moral disengagement mechanisms remains empirically unexplored.
“the impact of prosocial modeling on a young user's moral disengagement mechanisms remains empirically unexplored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe score associated with the dialogue response lines was not disclosed to the user.
“the score associated with the dialogue response lines was not disclosed to the user”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe disengagement mechanism represents heuristic reasoning of convenience that causes individuals to diminish and underestimate the dissemination of distorted information and its consequences.
“The disengagement mechanism represents heuristic reasoning of convenience that causes individuals to diminish and underestimate the dissemination of distorted information and its consequences”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe model included as covariates gender, age, socially desirable responding, and baseline levels of misleading news sharing intention and moral disengagement toward fake news, to minimize potential influence of confounding variables.
“To minimize the potential influence of confounding variables through the involved processes, the model included as covariates the gender and age of respondent, socially desirable responding, as well as the levels of misleading news sharing intention and moral disengagement toward fake news measured at the beginning of the web-app.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn intervention employing gamification-based logic, incentives and scores has the potential to foster resilience to dis/misinformation, which appears to persist over time.
“Such an intervention, which employs gamification-based logic, incentives and scores, has the potential to foster resilience to dis/misinformation, which appears to persist over time (Maertens et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maertens et al., 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationObserving a prosocial model not only demonstrates what behaviors are feasible but also promotes the adoption of the underlying prosocial goal.
“Indeed, observing a prosocial model not only demonstrates what behaviors are feasible but also promotes the adoption of the underlying prosocial goal (Jung et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jung et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sessions were overseen by two trained researchers who provided technical assistance while avoiding any substantive interaction with the task content.
“The sessions were scheduled one or two weeks apart, and were overseen by two trained researchers who provided technical assistance while avoiding any substantive interaction with the task content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe model was estimated by maximum likelihood, and inference for all parameters was based on 95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals computed from 5000 resamples.
“the model was estimated by maximum likelihood, and inference for all parameters was based on 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap confidence intervals computed from 5000 resamples”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe egoistic self-enhancement subscale had good internal consistency (alpha = .80; Omega = .80).
“Internal consistency was good for egoistic self-enhancement (α = .80;ω = .80)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationTechnologies designed based on theoretical models and intervention strategies developed to understand human behavior can represent a valuable resource.
“when technologies are designed based on theoretical models and intervention strategies developed to understand human behavior, they can represent a valuable resource (Greitemeyer & Osswald, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greitemeyer & Osswald, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe literature on dis/misinformation and disengagement suggests that a reflective and analytical mode of thinking may be a key factor in counteracting cognitive distortions and that consciously designed technologies could help counteract disengagement.
“The literature on dis/misinformation and disengagement is rapidly evolving, suggesting that a reflective and analytical mode of thinking may be a key factor in counteracting cognitive distortions (D'Errico et al., 2023; Herrero-Diz et al., 2020) and that consciously designed technologies could help counteract disengagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites D'Errico et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Herrero-Diz et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe literature on online sharing and prosocial intentions highlights a relationship that is not always straightforward, as users may share information hastily with the intention of helping others yet without verifying its validity.
“the literature on online sharing and prosocial intentions highlights a relationship that is not always straightforward (Mazhar et al., 2024), as users may share information hastily with the intention of helping others yet without verifying its validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mazhar et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis research was conducted in accordance with the principles of the WMA Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and the Ethical Code of the Italian Psychology Association (AIP).
“This research was conducted in accordance with the principles of the WMA Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and the Ethical Code of the Italian Psychology Association (AIP).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis result corroborates previous findings attesting to the role of prosocial peer influence on the development of prosocial behaviors and the positive effect of prosocial artificial agents.
“This result corroborates previous findings attesting to the role of prosocial peer influence on the development of prosocial behaviors (Busching & Krahé, 2020) and the positive effect of prosocial artificial agents (Oliveira et al., 2021;Peter et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Busching & Krahé, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Peter et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe research was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of [omitted for blind review]; approval was granted on the 20th of May 2024 under protocol number ET-24-14.
“The research was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of [omitted for blind review]; approval was granted on the 20 th of May 2024 under protocol number ET-24-14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSelf-persuasive processes reinforce the acquisitions derived from modeling and reduce the recourse to moral disengagement mechanisms and related sharing behaviors.
“they activate selfpersuasive processes (Aronson, 1999) that reinforce the acquisitions derived from modeling and, at the same time, reduce the recourse to moral disengagement mechanisms and related sharing behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aronson, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIndividuals must first acquire the necessary skills to help others; otherwise, the role of prosocial behavior can be ambiguous.
“individuals must first acquire the necessary skills to help others; otherwise, the role of prosocial behavior can be ambiguous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThrough interaction with a prosocial agent, individuals can learn not only to disengage morally but also to disengage less.
“through interaction with a prosocial agent, individuals can learn not only to disengage morally but also to disengage less.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningConversational tools could be flexible instruments for both research and intervention, as they allow the simultaneous observation of socio-cognitive processes and the manipulation of interaction scenarios within a controlled environment.
“From a methodological standpoint, this study points out that conversational tools could be flexible instruments for both research and intervention, as they allow the simultaneous observation of socio-cognitive processes and the manipulation of interaction scenarios within a controlled environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAs a sensitivity check, the full path model was re-estimated four times, each time replacing the prosocial communicative response composite score with single constituent items.
“As a sensitivity check, the full path model was re-estimated four times, each time replacing the prosocial communicative response composite score with single constituent items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough the model is adjusted for baseline levels and relevant covariates, the estimated paths and indirect effects should be interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects.
“although the model is adjusted for baseline levels and relevant covariates, the estimated paths and indirect effects should be interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSince disengagement mechanisms function as heuristic justifications for harmful actions, reducing their activation fosters a prosocial moral coherence.
“Since disengagement mechanisms function as heuristic justifications for harmful actions, reducing their activation fosters a prosocial moral coherence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample was drawn from a specific geographical region.
“the sample was drawn from a specific geographical region”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTargeting moral disengagement represents a key element, as it is a precursor to harmful online conduct.
“targeting moral disengagement represents a key element, as it is a precursor to harmful online conduct (Runions & Bak, 2015;Falla et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Runions & Bak, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Falla et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo participant or legal guardian declined participation or withdrew during the study.
“No participant or legal guardian declined participation or withdrew during the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBy framing the interaction as a peer-modeling and self-persuasion exercise where the user takes on the role of the expert to help a third party, the intervention shifts the focus from passive learning to an active practice exercise.
“By framing the interaction as a peer-modeling and self-persuasion exercise where the user takes on the role of the expert to help a third party, the intervention shifts the focus from passive learning to an active practice exercise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationProsocial communication has been identified as a potentially effective intervention: prosocial induction can counter misleading content by activating self-persuasion processes, such as through saying-is-believing exercises, with effects that persist over time.
“prosocial communication has been identified as a potentially effective intervention: prosocial induction can counter misleading content by activating self-persuasion processes, such as through “saying-is-believing” exercises (Aronson, 1999), with effects that persist over time (Orosz et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Aronson, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Orosz et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis interactive format offers a promising means of orienting human action toward desirable prosocial outcomes, as it fosters a sense of agency and reciprocal responsibility.
“this interactive format offers a promising means of orienting human action toward desirable prosocial outcomes, as it fosters a sense of agency and reciprocal responsibility (Oliveira et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliveira et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningCaution is warranted in interpreting intentions as proxies for actual behavior, given that the intention-behavior link may be shaped by situational, social, and contextual factors, particularly during adolescence.
“caution is therefore warranted in interpreting intentions as proxies for actual behavior, given that the intention-behavior link may be shaped by situational, social, and contextual factors, particularly during adolescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis study helps to clarify the function of moral disengagement in the context of misleading news from a preventive standpoint.
“This study helps to clarify the function of moral disengagement in this context from a preventive standpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWritten informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all student participants between May and June 2024.
“Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all student participants between May and June 2024.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe novelty of this study lies in introducing the link between prosocial modeling and moral disengagement.
“the novelty of this study lies in introducing the link between prosocial modeling and moral disengagement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The influence of the interaction between a prosocial model and a young user on moral disengagement has never been directly examined.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThis work extends and complements the existing literature on prosocial modeling, which has primarily focused on mere exposure to prosocial content, by emphasizing the added value of a conversational approach.
“this work extends and complements the existing literature on prosocial modeling, which has primarily focused on mere exposure to prosocial content (Greitemeyer, 2011), by emphasizing the added value of a conversational approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greitemeyer, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The authors state this as an assumption.
If adolescents perceive the interaction as low in quality (overly complex, disfluent, or insufficiently engaging with respect to the topic), this perception may attenuate the hypothesised paths within the model.
“It is assumed that if adolescents perceive the interaction as low in quality (overly complex, disfluent, or insufficiently engaging with respect to the topic) this perception may attenuate the hypothesised paths within the model (Paiva et al., 2021;Oliveira et al., 2021).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Sharing misleading news is not invariably the result of a deliberate intention to cause harm.
“It is not assumed that sharing misleading news is invariably the result of a deliberate intention to cause harm.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The influence of the interaction between a prosocial model and a young user on moral disengagement has never been directly examined.
“although prosocial behaviour is negatively associated with moral disengagement (Paciello et al., 2013), the influence of the interaction between a prosocial model and a young user on moral disengagement has never been directly examined.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Up to now, moral disengagement has never been taken into account considering misleading news-sharing behavior as a form of omission of the appropriate analytic evaluation and fact-checking operations due to lazy, automatic, heuristic, and careless processing.
“Up to now, moral disengagement has been never taken into account considering misleading news-sharing behavior as a form of omission of the appropriate analytic evaluation and fact-checking operations due to lazy, automatic, heuristic, and careless processing.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Jung, H., Seo, E., Han, E., Henderson, M. D., & Patall, E. A. (2020). Prosocial modeling: A meta- analytic review and synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 146(8), 635.
- Kline, R. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Fourth edition). The Guilford Press.
- Lucidi, F., Zelli, A., Mallia, L. (2013). The contribution of moral disengagement to adolescents' use of doping substances. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 44(6), 493-514. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2013.44.493 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huang, Y., & Wang, W. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15100676
- Authors
- Paciello, M., Corbelli, G., Sportelli, C., Cicirelli, P. G., & D’Errico, F.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- UniNettuno University (IT)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Corbelli, Giuseppe
- ORCID
- Venue
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Published
- 2026-08-05
- ISSN
- 2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
- 2662-9992
- OpenAlex
- W7172492759
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Compagnia di San Paolo (B99C20000640007)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- moral disengagement, adolescents, prosocial communication, online social interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-04.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-04.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review