The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins
Abstract
A model called SWRRB (Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins) was developed for simulating hydrologic and related processes in rural basins. The objective in model development was to predict the effect of management decisions on water and sediment yields with reasonable accuracy for ungaged rural basins throughout the United States. The three major components of SWRRB are weather, hydrology, and sedimentation. Processes considered include surface runoff, percolation, return flow, evapotranspiration, pond and reservoir storage, and sedimentation. The SWRRB model was developed by modifying the CREAMS (Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems) daily rainfall hydrology model for application to large, complex, rural basins. The major changes were: (1) A return flow component was added; (2) the model was expanded to allow simultaneous computations on several sub‐basins; (3) a reservoir storage component was added for use in determining the effects of farm ponds and other reservoirs on water and sediment yield; (4) a weather simulation model (precipitation, solar radiation, and temperature) was added to provide for longer‐term simulations and more representative weather inputs, both temporally and spatially; (5) a better method was developed for predicting the peak runoff rate; and (6) a simple flood routing component was added. Besides water, SWRRB also simulates sediment yield using the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) and a sediment routing model. Tests with data from a 538km2 basin in Oklahoma and a 17.7km2 basin in Texas indicate that SWRRB is capable of simulating water and sediment yield realistically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover
Ritchie, J. T. (1972) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr008i005p01204 · Cited by 2,240
Cited by
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Self-citationA comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., & Bernhardt, G. (1993) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-s · Cited by 939
Self-citationWhite, M. J., Santhi, C., Kannan, N., Arnold, J. G., Harmel, D., Norfleet, L., Allen, P., DiLuzio, M., Wang, X., Atwood, J., et al. (2014) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.69.1.26 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J. R., Nicks, A. D., & Arnold, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 970-986
- ISSN
- 0733-9429 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7900
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1985)111:6(970
- OpenAlex
- W2062072073
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1985)111:6(970
- The paper
- Williams, J. R., Nicks, A. D., & Arnold, J. G. (1985). Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1985)111%3A6(970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.