The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Traffic Flow Forecasting: Comparison of Modeling Approaches
Abstract
The capability to forecast traffic volume in an operational setting has been identified as a critical need for intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In particular, traffic volume forecasts will support proactive, dynamic traffic control. However, previous attempts to develop traffic volume forecasting models have met with limited success. This research effort focused on developing traffic volume forecasting models for two sites on Northern Virginia's Capital Beltway. Four models were developed and tested for the freeway traffic flow forecasting problem, which is defined as estimating traffic flow 15 min into the future. They were the historical average, time-series, neural network, and nonparametric regression models. The nonparametric regression model significantly outperformed the other models. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that the nonparametric regression model experienced significantly lower errors than the other models. In addition, the nonparametric regression model was easy to implement, and proved to be portable, performing well at two distinct sites. Based on its success, research is ongoing to refine the nonparametric regression model and to extend it to produce multiple interval forecasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Traffic Flow Prediction With Big Data: A Deep Learning Approach
Lv, Y., Duan, Y., Kang, W., Li, Z., & Wang, F.-Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2014.2345663 · Cited by 3,000
Short-term traffic forecasting: where we are and where we’re going
Vlahogianni, E. I., Karlaftis, M. G., & Golias, J. C. (2014) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.01.005 · Cited by 1,132
Miglani, A., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100184 · Cited by 295
Boukerche, A., Tao, Y., & Sun, P. (2020) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107484 · Cited by 215
Traffic flow forecasting for urban work zones
Hou, Y., Edara, P., & Sun, C. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2014.2371993 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, B. L., & Demetsky, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Transportation Engineering
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-266
- ISSN
- 0733-947X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5436
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1997)123:4(261
- OpenAlex
- W2079662306
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traffic Flow Forecasting: Comparison of Modeling Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1997)123:4(261
- The paper
- Smith, B. L., & Demetsky, M. J. (1997). Traffic Flow Forecasting: Comparison of Modeling Approaches. Journal of Transportation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1997)123%3A4(261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.