The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Abstract
Two main goals are achieved in this review of the empirical literature on factors affecting conflict resolution in watershed partnerships. The first is an assessment of two public policy theories relevant to partnership structure and function. The second is a set of practical suggestions for designing successful partnerships. The 37 available studies collectively identified 210 “lessons learned,” which were grouped into 28 thematic categories. The most frequently recurring themes are the necessity of adequate funding (62% of the studies), effective leadership and management (59%), interpersonal trust (43%), and committed participants (43%). Exploratory factor analysis was used to search for patterns in the lessons. Four factors were identified, which together explain 95% of the variance in the 28 themes. The first two factors emphasize the importance of (1) balancing the partnership's resources with its scope of activities; and (2) employing a flexible and informal partnership structure. The third and fourth factors offer modest support for two theoretical perspectives on collaborative resource management—the alternate dispute resolution framework and the institutional analysis and development framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 · Cited by 5,814
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637
Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02827-140126 · Cited by 912
Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement
CONLEY, A., & MOOTE, M. A. (2003) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920309181 · Cited by 505
An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance
Stephan, M., Marshall, G., & McGinnis, M. (2019) · Governing Complexity · doi:10.1017/9781108325721.002 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Leach, W. D., & Pelkey, N. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 378-385
- ISSN
- 0733-9496 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5452
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378
- OpenAlex
- W2078084396
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378
- The paper
- Leach, W. D., & Pelkey, N. W. (2001). Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127%3A6(378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.