The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Field Performance of Bioretention: Hydrology Impacts
Abstract
Flows into and out of two bioretention facilities constructed on the University of Maryland campus were monitored for nearly 2 years, covering 49 runoff events. The two parallel cells capture and treat stormwater runoff from a 0.24ha section of an asphalt surface parking lot. The primary objective of this work was to quantify the reduction of hydrologic volume and flow peaks and delay in peak timing via bioretention. Overall, results indicate that bioretention can be effective for minimizing hydrologic impacts of development on surrounding water resources. Eighteen percent of the monitored events were small enough so that the bioretention media captured the entire inflow volume and no outflow was observed. Underdrain flow continued for many hours at very low flow rates. Mean peak reductions of 49 and 58% were noted for the two cells. Flow peaks were significantly delayed as well, usually by a factor of 2 or more. Using simple parameters to compare volume, peak flow, and peak delay to values expected for undeveloped lands, it was found that probabilities for bioretention Cell A to meet or exceed volume, peak flow, and peak delay hydrologic performance criteria were 55, 30, and 38%, respectively. The probabilities were 62, 42, and 31%, respectively, for Cell B.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention
Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000026 · Cited by 238
Self-citationWinston, R. J., Dorsey, J. D., & Hunt, W. F. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.081 · Cited by 229
Loperfido, J. V., Noe, G. B., Jarnagin, S. T., & Hogan, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007 · Cited by 204
Pennino, M. J., McDonald, R. I., & Jaffe, P. R. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.101 · Cited by 156
Jarden, K. M., Jefferson, A. J., & Grieser, J. M. (2016) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.10736 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, A. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 90-95
- ISSN
- 1084-0699 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5584
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90
- OpenAlex
- W1968603270
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Performance of Bioretention: Hydrology Impacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90
- The paper
- Davis, A. P. (2008). Field Performance of Bioretention: Hydrology Impacts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2008)13%3A2(90
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.