Remedies to the PPP Crisis in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Lessons from the 2008 Global Financial Crisis
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a global economic crisis and is leading multiple local, regional, and national governments to increase public debt to unprecedented levels. This situation endangers current and future road public-private partnership (PPP) programs, given their dependence on user fees and/or government availability payments. Accordingly, this study aims to explore recovery measures to address short- and long-term road PPP-related challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, by considering recuperation actions implemented during the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC). To do so, this research examines the PPP-crisis literature through the lens of social network analysis (SNA) and concepts linked to network modularity and community detection techniques. The analysis focuses on unraveling semantic relationships between PPP-related keywords in order to understand lessons learned from the GFC and to propose suitable remedies for overcoming the consequences of the global economic crisis derived from the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings show that the PPP-crisis literature forms a comprehensive self-contained interwoven network that can be organized into five semantic communities according to concepts related to risk, financing, governance, procurement, and institutional environment. Based on such communities, the analysis suggests five recovery measures and highlights two implementation challenges (i.e., global supply chain disruptions and quantitative easing polici…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is unequal distribution of financial stability in the world, highly influenced by policy choices of major economies.
“This aids the argument that there is unequal distribution of financial stability in the world and that it is highly influenced by the choice of policy by the major economies (Castelblanco et al., 2022).”
From The Interactions Between Political Economy and Global Financial Crises: A Case Study of the 2008 Global Recession (2026) · cites this paper as Castelblanco et al., 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hochmair, H. H., Wang, X., & Hamid, M. B. A. (2026) · International Academic Journal of Economics · doi:10.71086/iaje/v13i1/iaje1305
- Authors
- Castelblanco, G., Guevara, J., & Salazar, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
- Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota 111711, Colombia.
- Corresponding author
- Castelblanco, Gabriel
- Venue
- Journal of Management in Engineering
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0742-597X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5479
- OpenAlex
- W4220912880
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management in Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, 2008 financial crisis, public debt, user fees, availability payment, PPP financing, PPP governance, PPP procurement, supply chain disruption, quantitative easing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review