The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multistationarity, the basis of cell differentiation and memory. II. Logical analysis of regulatory networks in terms of feedback circuits
Abstract
Circuits and their involvement in complex dynamics are described in differential terms in Part I of this work. Here, we first explain why it may be appropriate to use a logical description, either by itself or in symbiosis with the differential description. The major problem of a logical description is to find an adequate way to involve time. The procedure we adopted differs radically from the classical one by its fully asynchronous character. In Sec. II we describe our “naive” logical approach, and use it to illustrate the major laws of circuitry (namely, the involvement of positive circuits in multistationarity and of negative circuits in periodicity) and in a biological example. Already in the naive description, the major steps of the logical description are to: (i) describe a model as a set of logical equations, (ii) derive the state table from the equations, (iii) derive the graph of the sequences of states from the state table, and (iv) determine which of the possible pathways will be actually followed in terms of time delays. In the following sections we consider multivalued variables where required, the introduction of logical parameters and of logical values ascribed to the thresholds, and the concept of characteristic state of a circuit. This generalized logical description provides an image whose qualitative fit with the differential description is quite remarkable. A major interest of the generalized logical description is that it implies a limited and often quite small number of possible combinations of values of the logical parameters. The space of the logical parameters is thus cut into a limited number of boxes, each of which is characterized by a defined qualitative behavior of the system. Our analysis tells which constraints on the logical parameters must be fulfilled in order for any circuit (or combination of circuits) to be functional. Functionality of a circuit will result in multistationarity (in the case of a positive circuit) or in a cycle (in the case of a negative circuit). The last sections deal with “more about time delays” and “reverse logic,” an approach that aims to proceed rationally from facts to models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We have shown in related work that this representation of the HPG axis is capable of recapitulating the regular oscillations characteristic of the menstrual cycle when simulated with ternary logic38.”
From Leveraging Prior Knowledge of Endocrine Immune Regulation in the Therapeutically-relevant Phenotyping of Women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets
Kauffman, S. A. (1969) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(69)90015-0 · Cited by 4,871
Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression.
McAdams, H., & Arkin, A. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.814 · Cited by 1,970
Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits
Thomas, R. (1973) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90247-6 · Cited by 993
Self-citationThe logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks
Glass, L., & Kauffman, S. A. (1973) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90208-7 · Cited by 940
Regulatory networks seen as asynchronous automata: A logical description
Thomas, R. (1991) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80350-9 · Cited by 502
Self-citationGenetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis.
Mendoza, L., Thieffry, D., & Alvarez-Buylla, E. R. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.593 · Cited by 320
Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks—II. Immunity control in bacteriophage lambda
Thieffry, D., & Thomas, R. (1995) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf02460619 · Cited by 218
Self-citationHumbel, K. (1985) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)82967-0 · Cited by 214
Combinatorial and topological methods in nonlinear chemical kinetics
Glass, L. (1975) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.431518 · Cited by 187
Logical identification of all steady states: The concept of feedback loop characteristic states
Snoussi, E. H., & THOMAS, R. (1993) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0092-8240(05)80199-5 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 1989, Dyn. Stab. Sys., 4, 189
- 1975, Fed. Proc., 34, 14
- 1978, Prog. Theor. Biol., 5, 81
- 1979, Lect. Notes Biomath., 29, 391
- 1974, Biochimie, 56, 1529
- 1995, Bull. Math. Biol., 57, 277
- 1984, Adv. Chem. Phys., 55, 247
- 1993, Math. Model. Sci. Comput., 2, 144
- 1977, Biol. Cybern., 28, 40
- 1980, Bull. Cl. Sci., Acad. R. Belg., 66, 890
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sáez-Rodríguez, J., Alexopoulos, L. G., Epperlein, J. P., Samaga, R., Lauffenburger, D. A., Klamt, S., & Sorger, P. K. (2009) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2009.87 · Cited by 360
Bernot, G., Comet, J., Richard, A., & Guespin-Michel, J. F. (2004) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.04.003 · Cited by 249
Classification of microarray data using gene networks
Rapaport, F., Zinovyev, A. Y., Dutreix, M., Barillot, E., & Vert, J. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-35 · Cited by 240
Computational Modeling, Formal Analysis, and Tools for Systems Biology
Bartocci, E., & Lió, P. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004591 · Cited by 213
Hierarchical Differentiation of Myeloid Progenitors Is Encoded in the Transcription Factor Network
Krumsiek, J., Marr, C., Schroeder, T., & Theis, F. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022649 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, R., & Kaufman, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Venue
- Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 180-195
- ISSN
- 1054-1500 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2065782501
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
- Keywords
- multistationarity, feedback circuits, cell differentiation, cellular memory, periodicity, time delay, asynchronous logic, state tables, gene regulatory networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review