CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151Material Dynamics and PropertiesNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesLiquid Crystal Research Advancements

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular simulation of the transition from liquidlike to solidlike behavior in complex fluids confined to nanoscale gaps

Cui, S. T., Cummings, P. T., Cochran, H. D.·2001·The Journal of Chemical Physics
DOI 10.1063/1.1359736
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We report molecular dynamics simulations at ambient temperature and pressure of dodecane films of thickness between three and eight molecular layers confined between mica surfaces. We use an accurate united-atom model for dodecane and an effective interaction between the dodecane and the confining mica surfaces that is consistent with the surface energy of a mica surface. At ambient normal pressure, the strong surface–fluid interaction leads to increased dodecane density as the wall spacing is narrowed, crossing into a density region corresponding to bulk solid when the confined film becomes narrower than six molecular layers. Correspondingly, we observed a dramatic transition from a liquidlike to an ordered, solidlike structure when the confined dodecane film is reduced from seven to six molecular layers, consistent with experimental observation of many orders of magnitude increase in viscosity at the same film thickness. The solidlike structure is characterized by the layering as well as the in-plane orientational order of the dodecane molecules. At an extreme confinement of three molecular layers, the solidlike confined film is able to sustain a nonzero shear stress. These results with realistic models provide an improved understanding of the solidlike behavior observed in surface force apparatus experiments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1359736

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 1995, Phys. Rev. E, 52, 2587
  2. 1997, J. Chem. Phys., 106, 4309, 10.1063/1.473132 · DOI
  3. 2000, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 12, 1545
  4. 1976, Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 50, 449

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Related

Metadata

Authors
Cui, S. T., Cummings, P. T., & Cochran, H. D.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
ORCID
Cummings, P. T.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Published
2001-04-22
Volume
114
Issue
16
Pages
7189-7195
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
DOI
10.1063/1.1359736
OpenAlex
W1990257059
Cited by
151
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Liquid Crystal Research Advancements
Keywords
n-dodecane, confined liquids, melting, mica surface, nanoconfinement, viscosity, molecular layering, orientational order, shear stress, surface force apparatus, complex fluids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review