Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Time-resolved coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy: Imaging based on Raman free induction decay

Volkmer, Andreas, Book, Lewis D., Xie, X. Sunney·2002·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

A time-resolved coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscope allows three-dimensional imaging based on Raman free induction decay of molecular vibration with no requirement for labeling of the sample with natural or artificial fluorophores. A major benefit of the technique is the capability to completely remove nonresonant coherent background signal from the sample and the solvent, and thus increasing the detection sensitivity of CARS microscopy significantly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1456262

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Volkmer, A., Book, L. D., & Xie, X. S.
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2002-03-04
Volume
80
Issue
9
Pages
1505-1507
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2154302897
Cited by
292
References
0
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time-resolved coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy: Imaging based on Raman free induction decay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1456262
The paper
Volkmer, A., Book, L. D., & Xie, X. S. (2002). Time-resolved coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy: Imaging based on Raman free induction decay. Applied Physics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1456262

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.