Cited by 472Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesRandom lasers and scattering media

Chemically sensitive bioimaging with coherent Raman scattering

Camp Jr, Charles H., Cicerone, Marcus T.·2015·Nature Photonics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2015.60

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camp Jr, C. H., & Cicerone, M. T.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Cicerone, Marcus T.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2015-04-29
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
295-305
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W2047290343
Cited by
472
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 13
FWCI
32.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Random lasers and scattering media
Keywords
coherent Raman scattering, Raman imaging, chemical imaging, spontaneous Raman spectroscopy, chemical fingerprinting, functional imaging, biomedical imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review