The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy
Abstract
Optical spectroscopy at the ultimate limit of a single molecule has grown over the past dozen years into a powerful technique for exploring the individual nanoscale behavior of molecules in complex local environments. Observing a single molecule removes the usual ensemble average, allowing the exploration of hidden heterogeneity in complex condensed phases as well as direct observation of dynamical state changes arising from photophysics and photochemistry, without synchronization. This article reviews the experimental techniques of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy with emphasis on studies at room temperature where the same single molecule is studied for an extended period. Key to successful single-molecule detection is the need to optimize signal-to-noise ratio, and the physical parameters affecting both signal and noise are described in detail. Four successful microscopic methods including the wide-field techniques of epifluorescence and total internal reflection, as well as confocal and near-field optical scanning microscopies are described. In order to extract the maximum amount of information from an experiment, a wide array of properties of the emission can be recorded, such as polarization, spectrum, degree of energy transfer, and spatial position. Whatever variable is measured, the time dependence of the parameter can yield information about excited state lifetimes, photochemistry, local environmental fluctuations, enzymatic activity, quantum optics, and many other dynamical effects. Due to the breadth of applications now appearing, single-molecule spectroscopy and microscopy may be viewed as useful new tools for the study of dynamics in complex systems, especially where ensemble averaging or lack of synchronization may obscure the details of the process under study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experiments with an isolated subatomic particle at rest
Dehmelt, H. (1990) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.62.525 · Cited by 302
Rapid determination of the three-dimensional orientation of single molecules
Fourkas, J. T. (2001) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.26.000211 · Cited by 167
Cited by
Gehlen, M. H. (2020) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.100338 · Cited by 734
Synthetische molekulare Motoren und mechanische Maschinen
Kay, E. R., Leigh, D. A., & Zerbetto, F. (2007) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.200504313 · Cited by 624
Universal quenching of common fluorescent probes by water and alcohols
Maillard, J., Klehs, K., Rumble, C., Vauthey, E., Heilemann, M., & Fürstenberg, A. (2021) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc05431c · Cited by 306
Zhang, Z., Kenny, S. J., Hauser, M., Li, W., & Xu, K. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3528 · Cited by 278
Single-Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Photosynthetic Systems
Kondo, T., Chen, W. J., & Schlau-Cohen, G. S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00195 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Moerner, W. E., & Fromm, D. P.
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3597-3619
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W1976799229
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1589587
- The paper
- Moerner, W. E., & Fromm, D. P. (2003). Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1589587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.