Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Models for Elementary Particles

Open access
Derrick, G. H.·1964·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

It is shown that for a wide class of nonlinear wave equations there exist no stable time-independent solutions of finite energy. The possibility is considered whether elementary particles might be oscillating solutions of some nonlinear wave equation, in which the wavefunction is periodic in the time though the energy remains localized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1704233

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Derrick, G. H.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1964-09-01
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
1252-1254
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W2073756121
Cited by
1,404
References
1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.