The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prescription for the design and selection of density functional approximations: More constraint satisfaction with fewer fits
Abstract
We present the case for the nonempirical construction of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy by the traditional method of “constraint satisfaction” without fitting to data sets, and present evidence that this approach has been successful on the first three rungs of “Jacob’s ladder” of density functional approximations [local spin-density approximation (LSD), generalized gradient approximation (GGA), and meta-GGA]. We expect that this approach will also prove successful on the fourth and fifth rungs (hyper-GGA or hybrid and generalized random-phase approximation). In particular, we argue for the theoretical and practical importance of recovering the correct uniform density limit, which many semiempirical functionals fail to do. Among the beyond-LSD functionals now available to users, we recommend the nonempirical Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) GGA and the nonempirical Tao–Perdew–Staroverov–Scuseria (TPSS) meta-GGA, and their one-parameter hybrids with exact exchange. TPSS improvement over PBE is dramatic for atomization energies of molecules and surface energies of solids, and small or moderate for other properties. TPSS is now or soon will be available in standard codes such as GAUSSIAN, TURBOMOLE, NWCHEM, ADF, WIEN, VASP, etc. We also discuss old and new ideas to eliminate the self-interaction error that plagues the functionals on the first three rungs of the ladder, bring up other related issues, and close with a list of “do’s and don’t’s” for software developers and users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Self-citationDensity-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Self-citation
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Theoretical Investigations of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Pt(111)
Keith, J. A., Jerkiewicz, G., & Jacob, T. (2010) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201000286 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Perdew, J. P., Ruzsinszky, A., Tao, J., Staroverov, V. N., Scuseria, G. E., & Csonka, G. I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-08-08
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 62201-62201
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2117307259
- Cited by
- 953
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prescription for the design and selection of density functional approximations: More constraint satisfaction with fewer fits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1904565
- The paper
- Perdew, J. P., Ruzsinszky, A., Tao, J., Staroverov, V. N., Scuseria, G. E., & Csonka, G. I. (2005). Prescription for the design and selection of density functional approximations: More constraint satisfaction with fewer fits. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1904565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.