Cited by 207Scientific Research and DiscoveriesResearch, Science, and AcademiaParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier

Tobias, Sheila, Fehrs, Mary H.·1991·Physics Today

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2810250

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobias, S., & Fehrs, M. H.
Affiliations
Pacific University (US)
Venue
Physics Today
Published
1991-09-01
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
81-82
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W2095033642
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Today (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Scientific Research and Discoveries
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
scholarly publishing, journal rankings, research evaluation, scholarly communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review