The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving upon CCSD(T): ΛCCSD(T). I. Potential energy surfaces
Abstract
Despite the successes of spin-restricted coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)], it fails for systems away from equilibria, which might raise questions about transition states, e.g. In an attempt to remedy this failure, we implemented ΛCCSD(T) in a general purpose form for open and closed shells and with arbitrary single determinant reference functions, and applied it to a wide variety of bond-breaking examples. ΛCCSD(T) is shown to substantially improve the behavior of CCSD(T) at long bond lengths without significantly affecting the quality of the equilibrium results. Weighted average nonparallelity errors for HF, C2, N2, and H2O are reduced from 22mhartree for CCSD(T) to 10mhartree for ΛCCSD(T). Using ΛCCSD(T) with a Brueckner reference provides the best single reference coupled-cluster description of N2’s dissociation curve to date. Application of CCSD(T) and ΛCCSD(T) to the concerted transition state of 1,3,5-trinitrohexahydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) indicates that this transition state is well described by either methods, and indicates that the activation barrier is too high for it to be a major pathway of decomposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Self-citationKowalski, K., & Piecuch, P. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481769 · Cited by 440
Cited by
Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
Helgaker, T., Coriani, S., Jørgensen, P., Kristensen, K., Olsen, J., & Ruud, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002239 · Cited by 694
Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei
Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Hjorth-Jensen, M., & Dean, D. J. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302 · Cited by 531
Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction
Ekström, A., Jansen, G. R., Wendt, K. A., Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Carlsson, B. D., Forssén, C., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Navrátil, P., & Nazarewicz, W. (2015) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.051301 · Cited by 484
Optimized Chiral Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order
Ekström, A., Baardsen, G., Forssén, C., Hagen, G., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Jansen, G. R., Machleidt, R., Nazarewicz, W., Papenbrock, T., Sarich, J., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.192502 · Cited by 351
Evolution of Shell Structure in Neutron-Rich Calcium Isotopes
Hagen, G., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Jansen, G. R., Machleidt, R., & Papenbrock, T. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.032502 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Taube, A. G., & Bartlett, R. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-01-28
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 044110-044110
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1977767660
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving upon CCSD(T): ΛCCSD(T). I. Potential energy surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2830236
- The paper
- Taube, A. G., & Bartlett, R. J. (2008). Improving upon CCSD(T): ΛCCSD(T). I. Potential energy surfaces. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2830236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.