The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction
Open accessAbstract
With the goal of developing predictive ab initio capability for light and medium-mass nuclei, two-nucleon and three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory are optimized simultaneously to low-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering data, as well as binding energies and radii of few-nucleon systems and selected isotopes of carbon and oxygen. Coupled-cluster calculations based on this interaction, named ${\mathrm{NNLO}}_{\mathrm{sat}}$, yield accurate binding energies and radii of nuclei up to $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$, and are consistent with the empirical saturation point of symmetric nuclear matter. In addition, the low-lying collective ${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={3}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ states in $^{16}\mathrm{O}$ and $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$ are described accurately, while spectra for selected $p$- and $sd$-shell nuclei are in reasonable agreement with experiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review
Engel, J., & Menéndez, J. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5 · Cited by 533
Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes
Garcia Ruiz, R. F., Bissell, M. L., Blaum, K., Ekström, A., Frömmgen, N., Hagen, G., Hammen, M., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3645 · Cited by 367
Self-citationHigh-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion
Entem, D. R., Machleidt, R., & Nosyk, Y. (2017) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.024004 · Cited by 355
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 · Cited by 348
Self-citationA Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekström, A., Jansen, G. R., Wendt, K. A., Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Carlsson, B. D., Forssén, C., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Navrátil, P., & Nazarewicz, W.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-05-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W1555961330
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.91.051301
- The paper
- Ekström, A., Jansen, G. R., Wendt, K. A., Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Carlsson, B. D., Forssén, C., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Navrátil, P., & Nazarewicz, W. (2015). Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.91.051301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.