Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 919

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields

Open access
Maly, Thorsten, Debelouchina, Galia T., Bajaj, Vikram S., Hu, Kan-Nian, Joo, Chan-Gyu, Mak–Jurkauskas, Melody L., Sirigiri, Jagadishwar R., van der Wel, Patrick C. A., Herzfeld, Judith, Temkin, Richard J., Griffin, Robert G.·2008·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a method that permits NMR signal intensities of solids and liquids to be enhanced significantly, and is therefore potentially an important tool in structural and mechanistic studies of biologically relevant molecules. During a DNP experiment, the large polarization of an exogeneous or endogeneous unpaired electron is transferred to the nuclei of interest (I) by microwave (μw) irradiation of the sample. The maximum theoretical enhancement achievable is given by the gyromagnetic ratios (γe∕γl), being ∼660 for protons. In the early 1950s, the DNP phenomenon was demonstrated experimentally, and intensively investigated in the following four decades, primarily at low magnetic fields. This review focuses on recent developments in the field of DNP with a special emphasis on work done at high magnetic fields (⩾5T), the regime where contemporary NMR experiments are performed. After a brief historical survey, we present a review of the classical continuous wave (cw) DNP mechanisms—the Overhauser effect, the solid effect, the cross effect, and thermal mixing. A special section is devoted to the theory of coherent polarization transfer mechanisms, since they are potentially more efficient at high fields than classical polarization schemes. The implementation of DNP at high magnetic fields has required the development and improvement of new and existing instrumentation. Therefore, we also review some recent developments in μw and probe technology, followed by an overview of DNP applications in biological solids and liquids. Finally, we outline some possible areas for future developments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2833582

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 919

Metadata

Authors
Maly, T., Debelouchina, G. T., Bajaj, V. S., Hu, K.-N., Joo, C.-G., Mak–Jurkauskas, M. L., Sirigiri, J. R., van der Wel, P. C. A., Herzfeld, J., Temkin, R. J., & Griffin, R. G.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2008-02-07
Volume
128
Issue
5
Pages
052211-052211
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2091670229
Cited by
919
References
0
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2833582
The paper
Maly, T., Debelouchina, G. T., Bajaj, V. S., Hu, K.-N., Joo, C.-G., Mak–Jurkauskas, M. L., Sirigiri, J. R., van der Wel, P. C. A., Herzfeld, J., Temkin, R. J., & Griffin, R. G. (2008). Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2833582

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.