Cited by 23Evolution and Science EducationPhilosophy and History of ScienceScience Education and Pedagogy

Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism

Kitcher, P., Gladstone, Daniel·1983·Physics Today

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2915455

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitcher, P., & Gladstone, D.
Venue
Physics Today
Published
1983-01-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
85-85
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W4213156653
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Today (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
creationism, science education, evolution, science and religion, pseudoscience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review