Cited by 166Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time

Hawking, S. W., Ellis, G. F. R., Sachs, R. K.·1974·Physics Today

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3128542

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All physically reasonable forms of matter are believed to satisfy the dominant energy condition, so requiring it is not a significant restriction.

    “It is believed that all physically reasonable forms of matter satisfy the dominant energy condition [18,19], so we are not imposing a significant restriction.”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [18]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawking, S. W., Ellis, G. F. R., & Sachs, R. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Physics Today
Published
1974-04-01
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
91-93
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W2995975034
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Today (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
large-scale structure, cosmology, structure formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review