Cited by 58Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

Anomalous transport induced by sheath instability in Hall effect thrusters

Open access
Taccogna, Francesco, Longo, Savino, Capitelli, Mario, Schneider, Ralf·2009·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

It is well recognized to ascribe the anomalous cross-field conductivity inside Hall-effect thrusters to fluctuation-induced transport due to gradient-driven instabilities (Rayleigh or electron drift) and to electron-wall interaction (near-wall conductivity). In this letter, we have performed numerical experiments showing the possibility of another mechanism inducing azimuthal fluctuations: the lateral sheath instability. It is created by a negative differential resistance of the current-voltage I-V characteristic of the floating wall as a consequence of high secondary electron emission. The contribution from this effect to the anomalous axial current is calculated and it accounts of more than 80% of the experimental value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3152270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid models represent the best compromise in terms of accuracy and computational cost for modeling plasma thruster plume expansion and its interaction with the spacecraft.

    “Hybrid models 225-234 have therefore emerged in this context, as they represent the best compromise in terms of accuracy and computational cost for modeling the plasma thruster plume expansion and its interaction with the spacecraft.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [232]

  • Hybrid models feature a kinetic treatment of the ion species (and in some cases of the neutrals as well) so that CEX collisions are correctly captured, and a fluid modeling of the fastest species, the electrons.

    “In fact, they feature a kinetic treatment of the ion species (and in some cases of the neutrals as well) so that CEX collisions are correctly captured, and a fluid modeling of the fastest species, the electrons, which are subject to conservation equations.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [232]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taccogna, F., Longo, S., Capitelli, M., & Schneider, R.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Inorganic Methodologies and Plasmas (IT)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2009-06-22
Volume
94
Issue
25
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2093658324
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
Hall thruster, anomalous transport, negative differential resistance, secondary electron emission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review